From journal-of-educational-psychology-skills
Guides understanding of the Journal of Educational Psychology's masked peer review and editorial criteria. Use for pre-submission stress-testing or interpreting decision letters.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/journal-of-educational-psychology-skills:jedpsych-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The Journal of Educational Psychology combines selectivity for **educational importance** with rigorous
The Journal of Educational Psychology combines selectivity for educational importance with rigorous methodological scrutiny. Under masked review, both author and reviewer identities are hidden, and editors and expert reviewers weigh not only whether the finding is interesting but whether it is theoretically grounded, rigorously designed for its nested setting, and transparent. Knowing this lets you pre-empt the common rejection reasons.
jedpsych-submission).The scope and rigor screens mean many manuscripts never reach full external review. Confirm current categories on the journal's submission guidelines, but recognize these shapes:
| Pattern an editor sees | Likely outcome | Pre-empt it by |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability/validity of one instrument | desk reject (scope) | reframe around a learning question or choose a measurement venue |
| Program evaluation with no psychological theory | desk reject / decline | foreground the learning/motivation mechanism and a mechanism test |
| Classroom study analyzed as if students independent | major revision or reject | refit a multilevel model; power at the cluster level |
| Lab effect with no educational bridge | scope concern | argue the instructional/policy implication or go elsewhere |
| Stars-only stats, no effect sizes/CIs | rigor flag | estimation-first reporting with educational interpretation |
| Identity leaks under masked review | returned to author | scrub names, sites, grant numbers, first-person self-cites |
Manuscript: preregistered cluster-randomized reading trial (48 classrooms),
multilevel model, effect size + CI + mediation, TOP subsection.
Editor read: educational relevance (classroom reading), theory (strategy
instruction → monitoring), rigor (cluster-powered, nesting modeled),
transparency (data/code with DOIs).
Likely route: external review, probable major R&R for added robustness/
measurement detail.
Counter-case: same effect, single-level OLS on clustered data, no mechanism,
"data on request" → likely declined or heavy revision.
【Educational relevance】clear early? [Y/N]
【Theory + mechanism】grounded and tested? [Y/N]
【Design rigor】nesting modeled, cluster-powered, measures valid? [Y/N]
【Transparency + JARS】subsection + reporting standards strong? [Y/N]
【Masked】no identity leaks? [Y/N]
【Realistic outcome】reject / major R&R / minor R&R / accept
【Next】jedpsych-submission (or jedpsych-rebuttal if decided)
../../resources/official-source-map.md — masked review, scope, JARS, and preregistration policynpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin journal-of-educational-psychology-skillsExplains the Journal of Applied Psychology's masked peer review, action-editor model, dual gate of theory and rigor, and desk-reject patterns. Helps stress-test manuscripts before submission and interpret decision letters.
Explains Psychological Science's peer review criteria, editorial triage patterns, and Registered Reports pathway to help tailor manuscripts before submission and interpret decision letters.
Explains how JPSP sections judge manuscripts: masked review, innovation gate, central vs. peripheral limitations, and decision categories. Useful before submitting or interpreting a decision letter.