From joe-skills
Explains the Journal of Econometrics editorial process: single-anonymized review, editor screening, three submission tracks (Regular/Annals/Themed), and what methods referees expect.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/joe-skills:joe-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You want to know how JoE evaluates a methodological submission, end to end
Pick the track deliberately: a standalone advance → Regular; a contribution that fits an active call → Themed/Annals, where a Guest Associate Editor close to the topic may handle it.
run_all pipeline.joe-contribution-framing, joe-writing-style).joe-rebuttal.Before submission, assemble a four-item packet for the first editorial read:
| Packet item | What it must show | Where it appears |
|---|---|---|
| One-sentence method advance | The estimator/test/theorem is not a relabeling of an existing method | Abstract and first introduction paragraph |
| Closest-competitor contrast | Exactly which estimator, test, or asymptotic result is improved | Introduction table or paragraph |
| Formal-core promise | Identification, assumptions, rate, and inference are all proved or clearly delegated to appendices | Theory section map |
| Finite-sample credibility | Monte Carlo stresses the boundary cases where the method should matter | Simulation design summary |
If the packet cannot be filled without hedging, the paper is not ready for JoE screening. Fix the formal core before investing in formatting.
【Review model】single-anonymized; editor screen → ≥2 referees
【Track】Regular / Annals / Themed (+ Guest AE if themed)
【Handling editor】Co-Editor / Guest AE; final call by editors
【Referee hot spots】assumptions / asymptotics / size-power / positioning / reproducibility
【Editor-screen packet】advance / competitor / formal core / finite-sample credibility
【Scope check】methodological advance present? [Y/N]
【Next step】joe-submission
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin joe-skillsRoutes between joe-* sub-skills for Journal of Econometrics manuscript workflow, from topic selection through revision rebuttal. Activates when deciding which specialized skill to invoke next.
Guides navigating the Journal of Economic Growth editorial process: submission path, fit screening, referee expectations, desk-reject patterns, and review-stage planning.
Explains the JBES peer-review process: multi-Co-Editor model, method-referee scrutiny axes, and discussion-paper tradition. Use when planning a submission or cover letter.