From joc-skills
Prepares open-science materials for Journal of Communication manuscripts, including Data Availability Statements and Open Science Badges for quantitative, computational, and qualitative transparency.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/joc-skills:joc-open-science-and-transparencyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
JoC requires a **Data Availability Statement** on every article and offers **Open Science Badges** for
JoC requires a Data Availability Statement on every article and offers Open Science Badges for open data, open materials, and preregistration. Transparency is not an afterthought — build the statement and supporting materials as you write so submission and any badge claim go smoothly.
Because JoC spans communication research broadly, "transparency" differs across traditions. Match the deposit to the method rather than forcing one template:
| Method | What a JoC referee wants deposited | Badge most relevant |
|---|---|---|
| Survey / message experiment | data + codebook + stimuli + analysis script | open data + materials + preregistration |
| Content analysis | codebook + coder instructions + reliability subsample + texts | open materials (+ open data) |
| Computational / text-as-data | corpus or query, model/version, seeds, human-validation set | open materials + open data |
| Qualitative / critical | coding scheme + evidence tables + de-identified excerpts | open materials where ethics allow |
For computational measures, the human-validation set is itself the evidence that the automated label means what the paper claims — depositing the classifier without it leaves the construct unverified. Confirm badge mechanics against the journal's current guidance.
A computational content analysis of 40,000 news articles (illustrative) on climate coverage hits a familiar wall: the texts are copyrighted and the feed bars redistribution. The transparency path: (1) deposit the codebook, article IDs/URLs, query parameters, and analysis code so a same-license reader reproduces the pipeline; (2) deposit the human-validation sample, shareable derived data; (3) write a DAS naming the restriction, provider, and access route, and offering de-identified derived features (frame proportions per article) so modeling re-runs without raw text — earning open-materials credit and an honest, hedged DAS.
【Data Availability Statement】drafted? repository + identifier or exemption? [Y/N]
【Reproduces tables/figures?】master script verified locally? [Y/N]
【Badges sought】open data / open materials / preregistration (materials staged?)
【Documentation】README + provenance + seeds + pinned versions? [Y/N]
【Restricted data?】exemption note + access path + synthetic data?
【Qualitative transparency】coding scheme / evidence documented? [Y/N/NA]
【Next】joc-review-process
../../resources/external_tools.md — reproducibility tooling and qualitative-transparency options (OSF, QDR)../../resources/official-source-map.md — Data Availability Statement requirement + Open Science Badgesnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin joc-skillsPrepares transparency and reproducibility materials for Communication Research (CR) manuscripts: data-availability statements, deposited data/code/materials, preregistration, and the restricted-data path.
Prepares Psychological Science submissions for open-science requirements including open data/materials, Research Transparency Statement, persistent identifiers, and preregistration quality.
Guides compliance with JAP's TOP open-science requirements: data/materials/code deposits with DOIs, data-availability statements, and preregistration linking.