From jmr-skills
Describes the JMR review process stages including desk rejection, domain routing with EIC+Coeditor model, double-anonymized review, and interpreting decision letters. Useful before submission or after receiving a decision.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jmr-skills:jmr-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- Before submitting, to set realistic expectations for timing and decisions
JMR uses an EIC + Coeditor model. A single Editor-in-Chief oversees a panel of Coeditors (currently four; the incoming 2026–2029 team has five) who handle manuscripts by methodological/substantive domain, alongside Associate Editors and an Editorial Review Board. This is analogous to INFORMS-style departmental routing, but organized around methodological/substantive domains rather than fixed departments. Practical implication: your domain keywords and article type at submission influence which Coeditor/AE your paper reaches, so choose them to land with an expert in your area. (The by-domain routing chart itself is not published — 待核实 — so this is inferred from the masthead structure.)
Transition note: Rebecca Hamilton (Georgetown) is EIC of record through 30 June 2026; Raphael Thomadsen's incoming team (WashU) has handled new submissions since 1 April 2026. Authors submitting now are effectively reviewed by the incoming team.
jmr-contribution-framing) or additional studies, not just robustness.[Target] JMR
[Decision] desk-reject / reject / R&R / minor
[Routing] likely Coeditor/AE domain
[Pivotal bar] rigor / substance / both
[Editor's framing] key asks ...
[Tractability] addressable via analysis/studies vs. reframe
[Next skill] jmr-rebuttal (if R&R)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jmr-skillsExplains the Journal of Marketing double-anonymized review process, coeditor structure, substantive evaluation bar, and how to read decision letters. Does not draft responses.
Explains JAMS review process and how to read a decision letter. Covers Editorial Manager flow, double-anonymized developmental review, and area-editor structure.
Explains the JMS editorial and peer-review process: desk screening, double-blind review, reading decision letters. Does not draft rebuttals.