From jmis-skills
Creates and finalizes tables and figures for JMIS manuscripts, focusing on regression/SEM tables, platform/value figures, measurement-model exhibits, and artifact-evaluation charts.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jmis-skills:jmis-tables-figuresThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- A reader cannot get the headline result from the tables/figures without the text
A JMIS exhibit should be readable on its own: a self-contained title, defined variables and units, the sample and period, and a note stating the estimator, clustering, and what the stars/SEs mean. The reader should be able to state the finding from the table alone. Order exhibits to track the argument — descriptive/measurement first, main result next, mechanism and robustness after.
JMIS values managerial relevance, so a coefficient table that shows only significance underdelivers. Report economic magnitude — marginal effects, elasticities, dollar value, or lift — alongside (or instead of) raw coefficients, and put the number that matters in the table the reader will actually look at. Report standard errors (and the clustering level) clearly; a figure with confidence intervals often communicates an effect better than a wall of asterisks.
| Evidence type | Exhibits reviewers expect |
|---|---|
| IT-value / platform econometrics | Descriptives + balance; main DiD/IV table; an event-study figure with leads for parallel-trends; robustness table; magnitude in interpretable units |
| Behavioral survey (SEM/PLS) | Measurement model (loadings, CR, AVE), discriminant validity (HTMT / Fornell-Larcker), structural-path diagram with coefficients and significance |
| Experiment | Cell means with CIs, manipulation-check results, treatment-effect figure, mediation/moderation exhibit |
| Design-science / ML | Benchmark table vs. credible baselines with uncertainty; ablation; a figure tying performance to the managerial decision |
| Analytical model | Comparative-static figures showing how the key outcome moves with the parameter that carries the insight |
The complete manuscript is capped at ≤50 pages (12pt, double-spaced), so exhibits compete with text for space. Keep in the body the exhibits that establish the contribution; move secondary robustness, full measurement batteries, and large parameter tables to the online appendix — but never let a load-bearing result live only in the appendix. Figures should be legible in grayscale and not rely on color alone. (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准.)
A draft Table 3 reports redesign × post = −0.062 (0.018)*** and nothing else. A JMIS reader cannot tell what that means. The fixed exhibit keeps the coefficient but adds a column translating it to the managerial scale (−6.2 pp seller retention; ≈N exits/quarter at the observed base), states the estimator and the clustering level in the note, and is paired with an event-study figure whose flat pre-period leads visibly support parallel trends. The reader now gets identification and magnitude from the exhibits without leaving for the prose — which is exactly what a method-literate, management-minded JMIS referee scans for first.
Order is part of the argument: (1) descriptives/balance establish the sample and comparability; (2) the main effect table/figure delivers the headline with magnitude; (3) the mechanism exhibit shows why (mediation, heterogeneity, the channel); (4) robustness shows the threat-by-threat survival. A reader should be able to reconstruct the paper's logic from the exhibit sequence alone. Resist the temptation to front-load a dramatic figure before the reader can interpret it.
JMIS uses numbered bracketed citations [n] with an alphabetized reference list, so any in-text reference to a source inside a table note should use the same numbered form, not author-date. Number tables and figures consecutively, give each a caption that names what it shows (not just "Regression results"), and make sure every exhibit is called out in the text in order. Because the manuscript is double-anonymized, scrub identifying content from figures too — institution logos, internal dashboard screenshots, or proprietary platform names that reveal the author or data source belong out of the blind file or suitably masked. (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准.)
0.06*** is large; always pair significance with an interpretable magnitude.【Headline exhibit】reads alone? magnitude shown? [Y/N]
【Diagnostics shown】event-study/leads | measurement model + HTMT | benchmarks + uncertainty
【Inference labeling】SEs + clustering stated; CIs where clearer [Y/N]
【Body vs. appendix】contribution exhibits in body; ≤50pp respected [Y/N]
【Next step】jmis-writing-style
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jmis-skillsGenerates and audits tables and figures for Journal of Management Studies manuscripts: regression/SEM tables, interaction plots, data-structure figures, representative-quotes tables, and process models.
Designs MISQ-compliant exhibits: behavioral correlation/structural tables, economics-of-IS regression/robustness, design-science architecture/evaluation, and Gioia data structures, with page-budget control.
Builds JAMS manuscript exhibits: conceptual model figure, measurement/structural tables, interaction plots, and managerial summary tables in APA style.