From jmf-skills
Explains the Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) double-blind peer review process, including editor roles, reviewer expectations, and the revise-and-resubmit pathway. Use before submitting or when interpreting a decision letter.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jmf-skills:jmf-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Knowing how JMF screens and decides lets you pre-empt failure modes before submitting. JMF is
Knowing how JMF screens and decides lets you pre-empt failure modes before submitting. JMF is double-blind: reviewers do not know who you are and you do not know them, so anonymization is not optional. Use the current NCFR pages for live editor roster, portal, and timeline checks.
jmf-submission).Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the family process, population/sample frame, measurement validity, and longitudinal or comparative leverage; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: family scholars who inspect measurement, household process, longitudinal design, and implications for family theory.
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.【Anonymized for double-blind?】names/affiliations/acknowledgements/self-refs clean? [Y/N]
【Family-science significance】central and explicit? [Y/N]
【Literature engaged】incl. cross-discipline? [Y/N]
【Methods pre-empt】selection + non-independence addressed? [Y/N]
【Realistic outcome】reject / R&R (major or minor) / (rare) accept
【Next】jmf-submission (or jmf-rebuttal if decided)
../../resources/official-source-map.md — reviewer guidelines, editorial review process, and double-blind policynpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jmf-skillsRoutes JMF manuscript submissions to the correct sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and format (full article vs. brief report). Use when starting a new paper, deciding format, or returning with a decision letter.
Explains the JMS editorial and peer-review process: desk screening, double-blind review, reading decision letters. Does not draft rebuttals.
Provides verified details on JHR's single-anonymous review, fast desk-reject policy, reconciliation requirement, and optional review-recycling shortcut. Useful for planning submission strategy and setting expectations.