From jme-skills
Plans a response letter and revision strategy for a Journal of Monetary Economics revise-and-resubmit, under the up-or-out rule where the resubmission ends in acceptance or rejection with no second R&R round.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jme-skills:jme-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- A JME decision letter invited a revise-and-resubmit
An R&R at JME is a strong signal — editors invite a resubmission only when they judge at least a 50% likelihood of ultimate publication. But it is not a green light to iterate forever. The defining rule is "up or out": the resubmission must result in acceptance or rejection — there is no second round of revise-and-resubmit. Your one revision has to fully resolve the editors' and (typically two) referees' concerns. Treat every substantive comment as decision-relevant; an unaddressed major point can flip the outcome to reject because there is no further round to fix it.
Because review is single anonymized (referees know who you are), keep the tone collegial and precise, and address each referee directly.
Use this as a second-pass capability check. First lock the main macro object, the identifying variation, and the policy-relevant counterfactual; then test whether the manuscript addresses macro and monetary economists who expect the shock, mechanism, and policy margin to be visible early.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Decision】R&R (⇒ ~50% likelihood; next decision is accept or reject)
【Make-or-break points】[list — must be fully resolved]
【Minor points】[list]
【New analysis location】online supplement (body ≤40pp / ≤10 exhibits)
【Tone】collegial, point-by-point
【Next step】submit the single "up or out" revision
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jme-skillsCreates a prioritized point-by-point rebuttal and revision plan for JMCB decision letters and referee reports. Handles conflicting referee requests and identification/measurement demands.
Structures response letters and revision plans for Journal of Finance revise-and-resubmit submissions. Guides triaging editor and referee points, keeping within page limits, and routing robustness to the Internet Appendix.
Drafts response-to-referees letters and revision plans for JPE decision letters (R&R or reject-with-encouragement). Structures point-by-point rebuttals and change summaries.