From jfqa-skills
Explains JFQA's review process: double-anonymous peer review, seven Managing Editors, $350 fee with $275 refund, and under 9% acceptance. Use to interpret decision letters and set expectations after submission.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jfqa-skills:jfqa-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use this skill to understand what happens to a **JFQA** manuscript after submission, so you submit informed and read decision letters correctly.
Use this skill to understand what happens to a JFQA manuscript after submission, so you submit informed and read decision letters correctly.
| Letter outcome | Realistic meaning | Next move |
|---|---|---|
| Desk reject ($275 refunded) | failed the Managing Editor's fit/quality screen | diagnose which screen (scope, abstract, length, identification) before retargeting |
| Reject after review | the paper may return only if substantially modified — and the prior rejection must be disclosed in the cover letter | weigh a deep rebuild vs. another outlet; never quietly resubmit |
| R&R, major | a genuine path, with heavy identification/robustness asks | jfqa-rebuttal, full triage |
| Conditional accept | execute the remaining items precisely | finish edits, then build the Dataverse archive (jfqa-replication-and-data-policy) |
Draft a one-sentence answer to each, because the manuscript will be read for exactly these:
If any answer takes more than one sentence, route back through the relevant jfqa-* skill before paying the fee.
【Editor】per-paper Managing Editor (7-person panel)
【Model】double-anonymous; blind to reviewers
【Fee math】$350 paid; $75 retained on desk reject
【Odds】<9% printed of 1,000+; expect attrition
【Next step】jfqa-submission (preflight) → jfqa-rebuttal (on R&R)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jfqa-skillsExplains the Journal of Banking & Finance editorial pipeline: desk screen, double-anonymized refereeing, the USD 350 fee's role in reviewer rewards, and submission-to-decision expectations.
Routes a JFQA manuscript through topic selection, literature positioning, identification, data analysis, contribution framing, tables/figures, writing style, code archive, review, submission, and rebuttal stages.
Explains the Journal of Financial Intermediation's editorial process: desk-rejection policy, single-blind review, limited appeals, and Managing Editor selection. Sets expectations for authors.