From jet-skills
Builds a response letter for a Journal of Economic Theory (JET) revise-and-resubmit, addressing referee comments on correctness, generality, and exposition with proof corrections and .tex diffs.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jet-skills:jet-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You received an R&R (or a reject-and-resubmit) from JET and must reply to referees
thm-restate), and tighten notation..tex that implements the change.| Report claim | Stakes | First move | Letter posture |
|---|---|---|---|
| "The proof of Lemma k has a gap" | paper-sinking if real | re-derive the step from scratch; do not pattern-match the old argument | corrected argument in full, or a narrowed claim |
| "Here is a counterexample to Proposition j" | decisive either way | verify it against every numbered assumption | if valid: thank, repair or narrow; if it violates an assumption: show which line fails |
| "Is Assumption A2 necessary?" | scope of the contribution | attempt the weakening; else construct the dropping-A2 example | a new Example or a generalized theorem |
| "This follows from [known theorem]" | originality | write out the claimed reduction or its failure point | the precise reason the known theorem does not apply |
| "Proofs are unreadable" | acceptance friction | restate theorems, add a lemma roadmap, offload to appendix | a table mapping moved material to new locations |
Editor summary (≤1 page, theorem-level):
Theorem 1 unchanged; Proposition 2 narrowed (now requires A4 — see R1.3);
new Example 3 shows A2 cannot be dropped (R2.1); Appendix C rewritten for readability.
Per referee, per point:
[R1.3] "<verbatim comment>"
→ Type: correctness
→ Response: corrected the Lemma 2 step; the missing case is handled by new eq. (12)
→ Location: §4.2 and Appendix B.1; flagged in the attached latexdiff
Attachments: revised .tex, latexdiff PDF, this letter.
【Referee N · Comment k】<verbatim>
→ Type: correctness | generality/necessity | exposition
→ Response: <corrected proof / counterexample / narrowed claim>
→ Change at: §x / Prop y / eq (z) in revised .tex
【Net effect】result strengthened / scope clarified / claim narrowed
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jet-skillsGuides revision strategy for Econometric Theory decision letters: triages referee comments, prioritizes proof fixes, structures the point-by-point response letter.
Drafts a response letter and revision plan for AEJ: Micro R&R. Structures replies to theory referees on correctness, generality, and exposition; triages comments by priority.
Structures point-by-point rebuttal letters and revision plans for Econometrica manuscripts after receiving referee reports. Helps sort referee comments and organize proof fixes, generality additions, or simulation evidence.