From jbv-skills
Plans revisions and drafts point-by-point response letters for Journal of Business Venturing R&R decisions, prioritizing editor concerns and defending entrepreneurship contribution.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jbv-skills:jbv-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You received a major-revision (R&R) decision from a JBV handling editor
Do not draft the response before the manuscript is actually revised — a response that promises changes not yet made reads as evasive to a developmental handling editor.
Because the handling editor's letter sets the priorities at JBV:
JBV's bar is advancing theory about the entrepreneurial phenomenon. If a reviewer says "this could be any organization," do not just add startup vocabulary — show the mechanism is specifically entrepreneurial (uncertainty, novelty/liability of newness, opportunity, founding choice) and sharpen the contribution statement.
| Objection in the letter | A response that satisfies a JBV handling editor |
|---|---|
| "Entrepreneurship feels incidental here." | Add an analysis turning on a venture primitive (moderation by uncertainty/novelty) and rewrite the contribution around it — not just startup vocabulary. |
| "Founder choices are endogenous." | Add a selection model or design check, report how the estimate moves, concede if it attenuates while explaining residual meaning. |
| "Survivor sample undercuts the antecedent claim." | Re-estimate on a failed-inclusive frame or report bounds; state what survivor-only over- or under-stated. |
| "Reviewers disagree with each other." | Adjudicate in the cover note: which path you took, why it serves the contribution, and the road not taken. |
A reviewer writes: "Team prior-experience on funding is just human capital — nothing entrepreneurial."
【Round】1 / 2 / ... ; decision = major R&R ...
【Field-editor priorities addressed】...
【Entrepreneurship contribution】how strengthened ...
【Selection/survivorship/identification】new analyses ...
【Point-by-point status】addressed / partially / pushed back (with evidence) ...
【Cover note】major-changes summary drafted? ...
【Next step】resubmit via Editorial Manager
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin jbv-skillsDrafts point-by-point response-to-reviewers for Journal of Management Studies R&R, handling reviewer conflicts and theoretical contribution reframing.
Structures a response letter and revision strategy for a JBES R&R or major revision decision. Triages referee comments by priority and routes analysis to the relevant jbes-* skill.
Drafts the point-by-point response letter for a Journal of Management R&R, handling reviewer conflicts, editor-first strategy, and 50-page limit compliance.