Stats
Actions
Tags
From icml-skills
Guides placement of ICML 2026 submission material across main body, same-PDF appendices, supplementary manuscript, and code/data supplement to avoid reviewer rejection.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/icml-skills:icml-supplementaryThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use this to place material correctly. ICML 2026 allows references and unlimited appendices in the
Use this to place material correctly. ICML 2026 allows references and unlimited appendices in the same PDF, plus supplementary manuscripts and code/data, but critical evaluation material should be in the main paper because reviewers may choose whether to inspect supplements.
If an ICML submission cites another concurrent ICML submission by overlapping authors, include the anonymized PDF in supplementary material and explain the relationship in the main paper.
ICML reviewers may skip supplements, so misplacement is a real acceptance risk, not a formatting nit. Decide placement by whether a reviewer can judge the claim without the material.
| Material | Needed to judge the claim? | Correct ICML home |
|---|---|---|
| Headline benchmark and main ablation | Yes | Main 8-page body |
| Full proof of a stated theorem | Reviewer may verify on request | Same-PDF appendix |
| Extended hyperparameter grid, extra seeds | Supports but does not define | Same-PDF appendix |
| Runnable code, environment, README | For reproducibility audit | Anonymized code/data supplement |
| Overlapping-author concurrent paper | For dual-submission judgment | Supplementary manuscript |
For an adaptive-step optimizer with a non-convex convergence theorem plus deep-learning benchmarks, the convergence theorem statement, one decisive benchmark, and the component ablation stay in the 8-page body. The full proof, the step-size sensitivity sweep, and per-seed tables go to the same-PDF appendix. The training scripts and environment file go to the code/data supplement. Because accepted ICML papers can publish original supplementary material, scrub the code supplement of identity leaks and unreleasable data before upload. A common reject pattern is burying the only fair tuned baseline in the appendix where a heavily loaded reviewer never looks. When the appendix is unlimited, the temptation is to defer hard results; resist it, because at ICML the decisive evidence has to sit in the main body where the soundness judgment is actually formed.
[Main body] <items that must stay>
[Appendix PDF] <items>
[Supplementary manuscript] <items>
[Code/data supplement] <items>
[Camera-ready public artifact] <items>
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin icml-skillsOrganizes ICLR appendices, supplementary files, and anonymous artifacts under OpenReview rules. Decides main-text vs appendix placement and labels discussion-period revisions.
Guides placement of NeurIPS paper content across main body, references, appendices, checklist, ZIP, and external artifacts while maintaining double-blind anonymity.
Walks through the ICML camera-ready process: OpenReview form, PMLR agreement, format checker, lay summary, deanonymization, conflict disclosure, and post-conference revision rules.