From european-sociological-review-skills
Polishes European Sociological Review manuscripts for comparative quantitative audiences, enforcing OUP/ESR conventions and word limits (8k words inclusive).
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/european-sociological-review-skills:eursr-writing-styleThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
An ESR paper must be readable by a comparative-minded quantitative sociologist, formatted to OUP/ESR
An ESR paper must be readable by a comparative-minded quantitative sociologist, formatted to OUP/ESR conventions, and disciplined to a target length that includes endnotes and references. This skill is about reaching ESR's audience and respecting the format — not generating claims.
eursr-theory-building) in words first; the estimates serve it. Avoid a results-first narration.eursr-literature-positioning).| Weakness | Comparative reader experiences | Prose fix |
|---|---|---|
| Results-first narration | can't find the argument | lead with the mechanism + hypotheses |
| Stars-only interpretation | doesn't know the magnitude | translate to a predicted-probability scenario |
| Coding schemes undefined | stalls on ISCED/EGP | define harmonization on first use |
| Over-long reference strings | length burned, argument thin | prune; endnotes + references count |
| Self-citation in identifying voice | anonymity broken | "in a prior study," not "in our prior study" |
A multilevel-study introduction is rewritten to reach the ESR audience.
Before: "We estimate random-slope models of the SES gradient in test scores across PISA waves..."
→ method-first; the reader doesn't know the argument
After: "Does early tracking widen the social gap in achievement by forcing high-stakes choices on
families under uncertainty? We argue it shifts the gap from performance to choice..." → mechanism
first, hypothesis visible, comparison implied
Abstract: trimmed 236 → 192 words, finding plain, no institution named → within ≤200
Length: pruned 35 redundant citations + 4 long endnotes, recovering ~700 words toward the ~8,000 target
The contribution leads, the method follows, and the prune is treated as a budget item.
【Contribution stated by end of intro?】[Y/N]
【Mechanism-first, estimates translated?】[Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤200), non-identifying?
【Word count】Article ~8,000 incl. text + endnotes + references? (longer justified?)
【OUP style + anonymous + author-date】[Y/N]
【Next】eursr-transparency-and-data
../../resources/official-source-map.md — word/abstract caps, OUP citation style, anonymity, formattingnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin european-sociological-review-skillsDrafts and polishes American Sociological Review manuscripts to ASA Style Guide standards, with word limits and cross-subfield readability.
Drafts and polishes American Political Science Review (APSR) manuscripts to reach the whole discipline, follow APSA Style Manual formatting, and meet word caps (Articles <11,000 words, Research Notes <7,000, abstract ≤150 words).
Formats Social Forces manuscripts to Chicago 17th author-date, tightens prose for a general social-science audience, and fits the 10,000-word cap that includes references.