journal-of-international-business-studies

Journal of International Business Studies (journal-of-international-business-studies)

Journal positioning

JIBS is the flagship journal of the Academy of International Business (AIB) and the premier outlet for international business research. Its defining requirement is that the international or cross-border dimension be central, not incidental: multinational enterprises, foreign direct investment, cross-national distance, global strategy, internationalization, and institutions across countries. JIBS is multidisciplinary — strategy, economics, finance, organizational behavior, marketing, and political science all appear — but the contribution must advance IB theory and turn on the international element. The audience is IB scholars across disciplines, so a single-country or domestic study with a token "international" label will not pass.

This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official submission guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live author instructions on the AIB / JIBS / Palgrave–Springer site and the submission system.

When to trigger

• The author names JIBS (or the AIB flagship / FT50 international-business elite) as the venue.
• A paper's core question is genuinely international — MNEs, FDI, distance, internationalization, global strategy, cross-national institutions.
• A management/economics paper with an international setting needs re-framing so the cross-border dimension carries the contribution.
• The author needs JIBS's desk-reject risks and a credible strategic-management-journal / academy-of-management-journal / research-policy alternative list.

Scope & topic fit

• The multinational enterprise: entry mode, ownership, subsidiary management, global value chains, and headquarters–subsidiary relations.
• FDI, internationalization process, and the liability of foreignness; cross-national and institutional distance (cultural, institutional, economic).
• Global strategy, international corporate governance, cross-border M&A and alliances, and emerging-market multinationals.
• Multidisciplinary IB questions where the international dimension is the theoretical engine.

Method & evidence bar

• The international dimension must be theoretically central — the contribution should disappear if you removed the cross-border element.
• Methodological rigor is high and pluralistic: cross-country quantitative work, qualitative/comparative case studies, and mixed methods are all welcome with sound design.
• Cross-national data demand attention to measurement equivalence, sampling, endogeneity, and country/level confounds; distance and institutional constructs must be carefully operationalized.
• Contextualization is expected — the institutional and cultural context must be theorized, not just described.

Structure & house style

• The front end frames an IB theoretical problem and makes the cross-border dimension explicit from the start.
• A strong JIBS paper states its contribution to IB theory and how the international element changes predictions.
• Construct equivalence, country-level controls, and robustness are addressed; exhibits make cross-national comparisons legible.
• JIBS often expects an explicit statement of the international/IB contribution; re-check current requirements for that and for any structured elements.

Official-submission checklist

• Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the official source anchors for this journal family, then cite the current journal-specific page you checked.
• Search the live site for "Journal of International Business Studies submission guidelines / author guidelines" and follow the current version.
• Re-check word/length limits, abstract format, anonymization for double-blind review, reference style, and any required statement of the international-business contribution.
• Re-check current open-science, data-availability, replication, and AI-use disclosure policies.
• If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

• One sentence stating the contribution to IB theory — and confirming the cross-border element is essential, not decorative.
• Cross-national measurement equivalence, sampling, and country-level confounds are addressed.
• Distance/institutional constructs are carefully operationalized and theorized.
• The institutional/cultural context is theorized, not just described.
• Framing, references, anonymization, and any IB-contribution statement match the current JIBS guide.

Common desk-reject triggers

• A single-country or domestic study with an "international" label but no genuine cross-border contribution.
• Cross-national data with no attention to measurement equivalence or country-level confounds.
• A general strategy/OB/finance paper where the international dimension is incidental.
• Context described but not theorized; distance measures used mechanically without conceptual grounding.

Re-routing decision

• Strategy/firm performance without a central international dimension → strategic-management-journal; theory-driven management empirics → academy-of-management-journal.
• Org theory / innovation / computational → organization-science; sociology of organizations → administrative-science-quarterly; European theory-method → journal-of-management-studies or organization-studies.
• Innovation / STI / cross-border R&D policy → research-policy; broad management empirics → journal-of-management-en; HRM (incl. international HRM at the margin) → human-resource-management.
• International entrepreneurship → journal-of-business-venturing or entrepreneurship-theory-and-practice; pure theory → academy-of-management-review; review → academy-of-management-annals.

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Journal of International Business Studies
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest topics>
[Method/evidence] <is the cross-border dimension central and the IB contribution + rigor at JIBS's bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <submission system / length / references / IB-contribution statement / open-science>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>