From engineering-technology-journal-skills
Evaluates manuscript fit for Automatica journal: checks methodological breadth, theory rigor, routing vs TAC, and desk-reject heuristics for systems-and-control papers.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/engineering-technology-journal-skills:automaticaThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Automatica is the IFAC-affiliated flagship journal of systems and control,
Automatica is the IFAC-affiliated flagship journal of systems and control,
publishing rigorous, methodologically developed contributions across control,
estimation, identification, optimization, and the analysis of dynamical systems.
The defining expectation is a method with theoretical guarantees — stability,
convergence, optimality, robustness — developed with enough breadth and depth to
constitute an archival advance, not a single narrow result. Compared with its
sibling ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control, Automatica leans toward fuller
methodological development and breadth, whereas TAC also carries sharp short
Technical Notes; route by the form and length of the main result. Application
papers that tune a known controller, and simulation studies with no
generalizable guarantee, are a poor fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection
/ re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author
guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live Automatica author information.
ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control
by the form and length of the result, or between a full paper and a brief paper.../../resources/source-basis.md and
../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Elsevier anchors, then
cite the current Automatica author-information page you checked.ieee-transactions-on-automatic-control.ieee-transactions-on-signal-processing.ieee-transactions-on-robotics / the-international-journal-of-robotics-research.ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Automatica
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest control subtopics>
[Contribution type] method-with-guarantee / analysis result / identification-estimation method
[Method/evidence] <does the result clear Automatica's breadth + proof-rigor bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Regular paper / Brief Paper
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / format / data-code / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin engineering-technology-journal-skillsGuides fit assessment, framing, and desk-reject heuristics for IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. Useful when targeting TAC or choosing between TAC and similar venues.
Guides authors on positioning algorithmic/optimization/ML-for-OR manuscripts for INFORMS Journal on Computing, including scope fit, method evidence bar, house style, and desk-reject heuristics.
Evaluates whether a robotics manuscript fits Science Robotics (AAAS) by encoding the journal's fit criteria, framing, method-and-evidence bar, house style, and desk-reject heuristics.