Plans post-panel rebuttal for Economic Policy conferences: triages discussant comments, decides what to fix vs. defend in the camera-ready paper.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/economic-policy-skills:ecopol-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- You have presented at an EP conference and have two discussants' written comments to address
At EP there is no private response-to-referees letter. The two discussants' comments are published alongside your final paper, and a summary of the panel discussion may accompany it (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准). So your "rebuttal" is mostly the revised paper itself: the reader will see the critique and your paper side by side and judge whether you answered it. This reshapes strategy:
| Point type | Response |
|---|---|
| Correct and fixable | fix in the paper; note the improvement where natural |
| Correct but unfixable (data/scope limit) | concede openly in the text; bound its impact on the conclusion |
| A genuine disagreement | add the argument/evidence to the paper that answers it; acknowledge the alternative view |
| A request beyond scope | address briefly; explain why it is a separate question |
| A policy-framing concern | sharpen the policy bottom line / units (ecopol-tables-figures, ecopol-writing-style) |
For each of the two discussants, work through every substantive point with this triage; do not cherry-pick the easy ones.
ecopol-identification, ecopol-robustness); the policy discussant's usually mean framing/magnitude/legibility changes.【Journal】Economic Policy (EP)
【Skill】ecopol-rebuttal
【Format reality】discussant comments published alongside the paper
【Discussant 1 (academic)】points → fix/concede/defend
【Discussant 2 (policy)】points → fix/concede/defend
【Central magnitude】re-defended if challenged? Y/N
【Open concessions】stated in text + impact bounded? Y/N
【Policy bottom line】still coherent post-revision? Y/N
【Next step】finalize camera-ready → ecopol-submission (Stage 3)
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin economic-policy-skillsWar-games the two named discussants (academic and policy) for an Economic Policy panel review, building an objection ledger and pre-conference fixes.
Structures response letters to referees and editors for AEJ: Economic Policy decisions, focusing on policy relevance and revision planning.
Structures response strategies and revision letters for JPubE decision letters. Helps decode editor priorities, classify referee comments, and write point-by-point rebuttals.