From developmental-psychology-skills
Structures the response letter for a Developmental Psychology (APA) revise-and-resubmit addressing measurement-invariance tests, attrition analyses, robustness checks, JARS disclosure, and transparency requests.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/developmental-psychology-skills:devpsych-rebuttalThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
A Developmental Psychology **R&R** typically asks for **a measurement-invariance test, an attrition
A Developmental Psychology R&R typically asks for a measurement-invariance test, an attrition analysis, added robustness, fuller JARS disclosure, or stronger transparency — and all of it must fit back inside the length tier, with masking intact if review is masked. The response letter must convert every reviewer and reassure the handling editor that the developmental claim is credible.
devpsych-open-science-and-transparency).For each reviewer comment:
> [Quoted reviewer comment]
Response: [What we did / why we respectfully disagree].
Change: [Main text section, supplement section, or table/figure number].
Open with a short summary of the main changes to the editor; group by reviewer; end each entry with the location (note when content went to the supplement to protect the length tier).
For the three-wave effortful-control package, an R&R asked for invariance, attrition handling, and N.
> R2: You interpret growth, but is the measure invariant across ages 4-8?
Response: A fair and important point. We now test measurement invariance
before interpreting change: configural, metric, and scalar invariance hold
across waves (ΔCFI < .01; table now in Results). Mean change is therefore
interpretable on a common metric.
Change: Results (new invariance subsection + Table 2); Method (test plan).
> R1: Attrition (18%) could bias the trajectory.
Response: We refit all models with FIML under MAR and compared completers
and dropouts on baseline covariates (no differences). A pattern-mixture
sensitivity analysis leaves the slope and interaction unchanged.
Change: Results (FIML); attrition + sensitivity analysis → Supplement S2.
| Reviewer ask | Default home (protects the length tier) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Measurement-invariance test | Method + Results (it underwrites the claim) | compact table; full fit indices to supplement |
| Attrition / missing-data analysis | Results + supplement | FIML/MI in text; full table in supplement |
| Added robustness / alternative model | online supplemental material | one summarizing sentence in main text |
| "Address age vs. cohort" | Discussion (+ design note) | reframe or add covariate/sequential argument |
| Fuller JARS disclosure | Method + data-availability statement | a table, not prose, to save words |
| Effect-size/CI reporting | tables and inline | route exhibits to devpsych-tables-figures |
【Editor's decisive points】addressed first? [list]
【Coverage】every reviewer comment answered? [Y/N]
【Claim strengthened】invariance/attrition/power/disclosure improved? [Y/N]
【Length tier】new material in supplement; main text within limit? [Y/N]
【Transparency updated】scripts/data/data-availability statement in sync? [Y/N]
【Masking intact】[Y/N/NA]
【Next】resubmit via Editorial Manager
../../resources/official-source-map.md — review model, JARS, TOP, and length tiers../../resources/external_tools.md — invariance/SEM, missing-data, and power toolingnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin developmental-psychology-skillsStructures the response letter for a Journal of Educational Psychology R&R, addressing requested methodological rigor, JARS disclosure, and transparency while keeping the manuscript masked and within format.
Structures a point-by-point response letter for a Psychological Science R&R, addressing reviewer requests for robustness, disclosure, and transparency while managing the journal's tight word budget.
Structures a response letter for a Psychological Bulletin revise-and-resubmit on a meta-analysis. Use when reviewer requests demand changes to the search, eligibility, model, or bias analyses.