From ci-skills
Routes Critical Inquiry essays to the right sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and format (Article, Critical Response, Review). Dispatches across topic selection, argument, evidence, theory, structure, writing, citation, review, submission, and revision.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/ci-skills:ci-workflowThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The orchestrator for a *Critical Inquiry* submission. Figure out the stage and the **format**, then
The orchestrator for a Critical Inquiry submission. Figure out the stage and the format, then send the user to the matching skill. CI is interdisciplinary criticism and theory — not a single discipline's house organ — so the router's first job is to make sure the essay is built around a theoretical intervention that matters across fields, not a competent reading with no stakes.
ci-revision-and-response)| Situation | Format | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Full original argument, interdisciplinary stakes | Article (≤ 9,500 words) | normal pipeline below |
| Reply to or debate with a published CI piece | Critical Response (≤ 3,000 words) | ci-argument-and-intervention + ci-scholarly-positioning |
| Short notice of a book/exhibition | Review (≤ 500 words) | ci-writing-style + ci-submission |
| A themed cluster of essays | Special issue (editor-proposed) | ci-review-process (proposal route) |
The 9,500-word article cap includes discursive notes and all bibliographical information — plan the notes into the budget from the start (see
ci-writing-style).
Is this a CI-shaped problem? → ci-topic-selection
Whose conversation am I entering? → ci-scholarly-positioning
What is the intervention? → ci-argument-and-intervention
What objects does it read? → ci-evidence-and-objects
Which theory, used how? → ci-theory-and-method
How is the essay built? → ci-structure-and-exposition
Does the prose earn the claim? → ci-writing-style
Notes / images / Chicago style? → ci-citation-and-style
How will it be judged? → ci-review-process
Ready to submit? → ci-submission
Got a decision / revise request? → ci-revision-and-response
topic-selection → scholarly-positioning → argument-and-intervention → evidence-and-objects → theory-and-method → structure-and-exposition → writing-style → citation-and-style → review-process → submission → revision-and-response
Iterate: most essays loop argument ↔ objects ↔ theory several times before the prose settles.
Treat this skill as an executable review pass, not a prose hint. First lock the object, theoretical stakes, interpretive turn, and permission/citation discipline; then judge whether the current manuscript answers the venue's real reader: humanities reviewers who expect a strong interpretive intervention rather than an empirical-results narrative.
claim / evidence / risk / manuscript location rows, so the next agent can edit rather than rediscover the issue.resources/official-source-map.md has been checked for volatile rules and the manuscript has one concrete fix for the largest venue-specific risk.【Stage】topic / positioning / intervention / objects / theory / structure / prose / citations / review / submit / revise
【Format】Article / Critical Response / Review / Special issue
【Route to】ci-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
../../resources/external_tools.md — archives, image and text sources, theory shelf, Chicago tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official CI URLs behind every fact in this packnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin ci-skillsEvaluates whether a project fits Critical Inquiry's interdisciplinary standards and helps choose the right format (Article, Critical Response, or Review).
Evaluates manuscript fit for Critical Inquiry, covering conceptual-stakes bar, cross-disciplinary expectations, style norms, and desk-reject heuristics.
Plans and structures academic papers in philosophy and interdisciplinary fields, with AI-driven literature gap analysis and outline optimization for preprint platforms.