From asr-skills
Explains ASR's masked peer review process, decision categories, and ethics rules to help shape manuscripts for submission.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/asr-skills:asr-review-processThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Knowing how ASR reviews helps you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. ASR uses **masked
Knowing how ASR reviews helps you pre-empt the failure modes before submitting. ASR uses masked (anonymous) review and draws reviewers from across sociology, so a paper must read credibly to experts who may not share its method.
asr-submission).| Reviewer asks | You answer with |
|---|---|
| Does this matter to sociology broadly? | explicit significance + portable theory |
| Is the method done rigorously for its kind? | design defense in asr-research-design |
| Are claims warranted by the evidence? | the evidence chain / uncertainty in asr-data-analysis |
| Is the contribution distinct from prior work? | positioning in asr-literature-positioning |
ASR's masked process has predictable choke points, and as the ASA flagship its editors decline at the screening gate more readily than specialty journals do.
| Stage | What stops a paper here | Pre-empt by |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial screening | weak fit / narrow significance | front-loading the disciplinary stakes |
| Masking integrity | identifying wording or title page | the asr-submission masking pass |
| Review — significance | "interesting, not for sociology broadly" | a portable mechanism, not a setting-bound finding |
| Review — rigor | method not credible for its kind | the design defense in asr-research-design |
| Review — evidence | claims outrun the data | uncertainty + negative cases shown candidly |
A demographic paper on rising "deaths of despair" by education is mock-reviewed before submission.
Screening risk: reads as a mortality-trend description → reframe around the social-structural
mechanism (eroding labor-market position by credential) so a generalist sees the stakes
Significance reviewer: "matters if the mechanism, not just the rate, is the point" → mechanism headline
Rigor reviewer: "age-period-cohort identification?" → state the restriction and a sensitivity check
Predicted outcome: R&R, not first-round accept (typical at ASR for a promising paper)
Stress-testing against the panel before submission converts likely screening failures into a clean R&R path.
【Significance】broad enough for a general sociology reviewer? [Y/N]
【Method rigor】defensible for its kind? [Y/N]
【Evidence→claim】warranted and candid? [Y/N]
【Literature engaged】incl. cross-subfield? [Y/N]
【Realistic outcome】reject / R&R / (rare) accept
【Next】asr-submission (or asr-rebuttal if decided)
../../resources/official-source-map.md — masked review, ethics, ASA submission normsnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin asr-skillsExplains the American Journal of Sociology's double-blind, student-run review process including the 'preject' screen and reviewer assignment. Use before submitting to stress-test your manuscript.
Explains APSR's double-anonymous review process, desk-rejection grounds, decision categories, and Registered Reports route to help authors pre-empt failure modes before submitting.
Routes American Sociological Review manuscript work by lifecycle stage and manuscript type (Article vs. Comment/Reply). Dispatches to sub-skills for topic fit, literature, theory, design, analysis, tables, writing, transparency, review, and rebuttal.