From artbull-skills
Runs a final pre-submission preflight for The Art Bulletin: double-blind anonymization, required Word files, word/illustration caps, Chicago formatting, and permissions status.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/artbull-skills:artbull-submissionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The last check before e-mailing the submission to **[email protected]** (or via a
The last check before e-mailing the submission to [email protected] (or via a large-file transfer service). The Art Bulletin is double-blind and accepts Microsoft Word only — no PDFs, because PDFs cannot be anonymized for review. The most common avoidable failures are broken anonymity, a PDF submission, and an over-length manuscript. Verify volatile specifics on the official page first.
artbull-images-and-permissions)[email protected]) or large-file
transfer; Microsoft Word, not PDF.The College Art Association's quarterly can return a manuscript before review when the form makes review impossible or the fit is wrong.
| Trigger | Why it stops the paper here | Preflight fix |
|---|---|---|
| Submitted as PDF | A PDF cannot be anonymized for double-blind review | Submit Microsoft Word only |
| Author identifiers / metadata | Names, "as I argued in…," or document properties reveal the author | Strip from text, notes, and properties pane |
| Over length | Endnotes counted push the manuscript past the cap | Trim apparatus; recount with endnotes included |
Suppose an author is ready to e-mail an article on a Baroque ceiling program. The preflight finds three problems invisible in a casual read. The document properties still carry the author's name from a re-save — a metadata leak that would breach the double-blind process. The word count "passed" only because the author forgot the endnotes, whose dense apparatus pushes the total over the long-form cap. And the illustrations were spread across two Word files, not the single file the office expects, with one over the size limit. None of these touches the argument, yet all three could trigger a return without review; the author clears the metadata, recounts and trims the notes, and consolidates the plates into one file.
【Files】manuscript · abstract · illustrations · captions · cover sheet — all Word? [Y/N]
【Anonymized】text + notes + metadata clean; Word not PDF? [Y/N]
【Length】words incl. endnotes ≤ 16,000? abstract ≤ 100? bio ≤ 50? [Y/N]
【Illustrations】≤ 20 images, file ≤ 10 MB? [Y/N]
【Style】Chicago endnotes + captions/credit lines? [Y/N]
【Permissions】secured/underway + high-res plan? [Y/N]
【Next】await decision → artbull-revision-and-response on R&R
../../resources/external_tools.md — anonymization, Chicago, and image-prep tooling../../resources/official-source-map.md — official Art Bulletin / CAA submission facts and 待核实 markersnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin artbull-skillsRuns the final pre-submission preflight for The American Historical Review via ScholarOne: masked-author preparation, 8,000-word target, Chicago notes, manuscript formatting, image alt-text/permissions, and exclusivity declaration.
Runs the final pre-submission preflight for Mind journal via ScholarOne, checking triple-anonymous review, word limit, abstract length, line numbering, and submission rules.
Runs the final pre-submission preflight for Critical Inquiry via Editorial Manager — checks format, 9,500-word cap (including notes), Chicago 17th ed. footnotes, Word manuscript, separate 300 ppi images, and no-simultaneous-submission rule.