From annals-aag-skills
Guides positioning a manuscript in the geographic literature for Annals of the AAG, engaging area-specific debates and cross-cutting geographic concerns to frame the contribution's gap and conversation.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/annals-aag-skills:aaag-literature-positioningThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The Annals expects a paper to enter a **geographic conversation**, not merely to cite a domain
The Annals expects a paper to enter a geographic conversation, not merely to cite a domain literature with a few geography references appended. Position the work so its area's readers, and geographers more broadly, recognize the debate it advances.
Name the single closest prior account and write one sentence: "Prior work holds ___; we show instead/additionally ___, which matters for [geographic debate] because ___." If the closest prior account is in another discipline, you must still show how the contribution lands in geography.
| Area | Conversations to engage | Common gap to claim |
|---|---|---|
| Methods | spatial dependence, MAUP/scale, uncertainty, geocomputation | inference distortion others ignore |
| Human | the relevant social-spatial theory (urban, economic, political, cultural) | a relational/spatial mechanism missed |
| Nature-Society | political ecology, land-system science, hazards/resilience | one-sided treatments of coupled systems |
| Physical | process literature in the subsystem + RS/measurement | a process or scale gap in the evidence |
A draft on migration and climate cites a long climate-science literature and one geography reference.
Problem: reads as climate science with a geography citation appended (Human/Nature-Society editors
will ask "where is the geography conversation?")
Repair: map the field into positions — (a) climate-determinist accounts, (b) political-ecology accounts
stressing vulnerability-as-produced, (c) mobility/place-attachment accounts; place the paper among them
Closest prior account: the determinist reading; the contrast sentence states what the paper shows instead
Cross-cutting stake: how place attachment mediates environmental "push" — legible to migration, hazards,
and political-ecology readers alike
The revision enters a geographic debate and gives each area's reader a position to react to.
【Area conversation】the live debate this paper moves
【Closest prior account】name + the one-sentence contrast
【Cross-cutting stake】why geographers outside the subfield care
【Geographic theory engaged】concepts + their owners
【Next】aaag-theory-building
../../resources/exemplars/library.md — how Annals papers stake a position in a geographic debate../../resources/official-source-map.md — scope and area definitionsnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin annals-aag-skillsBuilds the conceptual contribution of a geographic manuscript by turning findings into arguments grounded in geographic theory. Sharpens the argument without running analyses.
Sharpens a Journal of Economic Geography manuscript's contribution by positioning against both the geographical-economics and human-geography frontiers, and sibling journals.
Positions interdisciplinary GEC manuscripts across social science, governance, and domain literatures. Shapes framing and citation strategy for environmental-change journals.