From american-anthropologist-skills
Defends research design for American Anthropologist manuscripts across ethnographic, archaeological, and biological anthropology.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/american-anthropologist-skills:amanthro-research-designThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
AA accepts many methodologies but is demanding about each. The design must credibly connect the
AA accepts many methodologies but is demanding about each. The design must credibly connect the
argument (amanthro-theory-building) to evidence — and at AA, ethnographic and qualitative inference
is first-class, not a soft substitute for statistics. This skill is mode-aware: pick the section that
matches your work and defend it against the strongest alternative reading, reflexively and ethically.
amanthro-literature-positioningamanthro-theory-building).amanthro-transparency-and-data for repatriation and consent).For the single strongest rival reading, write one sentence: "If the rival account were right rather than mine, the evidence would look like ___; instead it looks like ___." If you cannot, the design does not yet identify the contribution — regardless of how rich the material is.
amanthro-transparency-and-data)【Mode】ethnographic / archival-material / biological-quant / multimodal-participatory
【Evidence base】sites/interlocutors/assemblage/sample + how selected
【Key assumption(s)】and how each is defended (incl. reflexivity)
【Rival ruled out】the adjudication sentence
【Disconfirmation】what would have shown you wrong
【Ethics designed in】consent / anonymization / accountability flagged? [Y/N]
【Next】amanthro-data-analysis
../../resources/external_tools.md — CAQDAS, archival tools, and lab/quant packages by subfield../../resources/official-source-map.md — AA scope and ethics/transparency notesnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin american-anthropologist-skillsDefends the research design of a Current Anthropology manuscript across ethnographic, archival, archaeological, and biological modes, anticipating reviewer and commentator objections.
Defends the research design of an American Sociological Review manuscript across quantitative, comparative-historical, ethnographic, and computational methods.
Guides analysis and interpretation for American Anthropologist manuscripts, covering ethnographic inference, alternative readings, disconfirming evidence, and quantitative rigor.