From ajps-skills
Evaluates whether a political-science project fits AJPS and selects the right submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence).
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/ajps-skills:ajps-topic-selectionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
AJPS publishes across the discipline but most of its pages carry **rigorous empirical, experimental,
AJPS publishes across the discipline but most of its pages carry rigorous empirical, experimental, computational, or formal-empirical work. The test is not "novel to my subfield" alone — it is a clear, well-identified contribution that a broad political-science audience will cite. Use this skill to pressure-test fit before you invest.
A strong AJPS paper usually clears all four:
ajps-research-design) — empirics carry the paper.| You have... | Type | Note |
|---|---|---|
| A full original study | Article (<= 10,000 words) | the default research format |
| A methodological advance (incl. methodology in normative theory) | Research Note (<= 4,000) | reserved for methods + meta-analyses |
| A meta-analysis of an existing literature | Research Note (<= 4,000) | not a narrative review |
| A correction/critique of a paper published in AJPS | Correspondence (<= 4,000) | minor-error-only critiques risk desk rejection |
Do not pad a small empirical result into a Research Note: the Note type at AJPS is methodology and meta-analysis, not a short empirical paper. A focused empirical study is still an Article.
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political theory, design leverage, measurement validity, and scope condition; then test whether the manuscript addresses political-science reviewers who expect tight theory, transparent design, and a contribution that travels across political settings.
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.【Question】one sentence
【Generalizable payoff】who beyond the case cites this, and why
【Contribution type】theory / identification / measurement / method / meta-analysis / corrected record
【Submission type】Article / Research Note / Correspondence
【Fit verdict】strong / needs reframing / off-fit (why)
【Next】ajps-literature-positioning
../../resources/external_tools.md — data sources by subfield../../resources/official-source-map.md — AJPS submission types and word capsnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin ajps-skillsHelps determine whether a political-science project fits APSR and which of its five tracks to target, based on general disciplinary significance.
Evaluates whether a political-science project fits the British Journal of Political Science (BJPS) and selects among its three formats: Research Article, Letter, or Comment.
Helps determine whether a political-science project fits The Journal of Politics (JOP) and which article category to target, based on JOP's page budget and fit criteria.