From agsy-skills
Drafts and polishes Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscripts for a systems-science audience, enforcing front-matter requirements (abstract ≤250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract) and tightening prose to ~8,000-word guideline.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/agsy-skills:agsy-writing-styleThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
An AgSy paper must be readable by a broad **systems-science** audience — agronomists, modellers,
An AgSy paper must be readable by a broad systems-science audience — agronomists, modellers, economists, and environmental scientists — and prepared with the journal's front matter. This skill is about communicating a systems analysis clearly and meeting Elsevier's format, not about generating claims.
agsy-systems-framing-and-modeling).elsarticle for LaTeX).agsy-submission).Write each section to answer the question a systems referee raises there. Title: name the system and the trade-off, not just the crop. Abstract: lead with the interaction, end on the decision (≤250 words). Introduction: state boundary, interaction, model, and stakes by the last paragraph. Methods: plain-language model first, equations second. Results/Discussion: lead with the trade-off, then tie it to the decision and match claims to uncertainty.
Before (buries the system): "Simulations were run for several management options and yields compared across scenarios." — passive, no interaction, no trade-off, no decision.
After (systems-first): "A whole-farm bioeconomic model shows that shifting 30% of area to a legume intercrop raises modelled gross margin ~8% but increases nitrogen surplus ~14%, sharpening a margin–environment trade-off advisers must weigh when targeting rotation subsidies." — interaction, quantified trade-off (illustrative), and decision in one sentence.
agsy-literature-positioning).【Systems contribution stated by end of intro?】[Y/N]
【System defined early?】boundary + components + level? [Y/N]
【Abstract】word count (≤250)
【Highlights + graphical abstract】prepared? [Y/N]
【Length】near ~8,000 words; extras moved to supplementary? [Y/N]
【References + declarations】styled + CRediT/COI/funding/AI disclosure ready? [Y/N]
【Next】agsy-impact-and-implications
../../resources/external_tools.md — reference managers and Elsevier typesetting tools../../resources/official-source-map.md — abstract cap, Highlights, graphical abstract, declarationsnpx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin agsy-skillsDrafts and polishes Field Crops Research manuscripts for a general agronomy audience, enforcing FCR structure, concise results, interpretive discussion, abstract ≤400 words, and 3-5 highlights ≤85 characters each.
Runs a final pre-submission preflight for Agricultural Systems (AgSy) via Elsevier's Editorial Manager: checks article type, abstract ≤250 words, Highlights, graphical abstract, CRediT/declarations, funding/AI disclosures, reference style, and data/code/model availability.
Polishes prose for Management Science (INFORMS) manuscripts — front-loading results, pairing notation with intuition, enforcing author-year citations, and trimming to journal length preferences.