From agriculture-environment-journal-skills
Evaluates fit and framing for Geology (GSA) short research letters, encoding venue expectations, novelty bar, and desk-reject heuristics.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/agriculture-environment-journal-skills:geologyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Geology is the Geological Society of America's flagship outlet for **short, high-impact
Geology is the Geological Society of America's flagship outlet for short, high-impact research letters across the geosciences. The defining expectation is a contribution that is at once novel, broadly significant, and concisely framed for a wide geoscience audience within a tight length limit — a result that changes how a broad readership thinks about an earth process, delivered rapidly. The constraint is as much editorial as scientific: the science must be both important and compressible to a few pages, with the significance legible to non-specialists. A thorough but incremental study, a regional report without wide implications, or a paper that genuinely needs full article length to make its case is a poor fit, regardless of quality. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current author guidance. Before submitting, re-check the live Geology / GSA author instructions and data policy.
earth-and-planetary-science-letters
(longer quantitative process article).../../resources/source-basis.md and
../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the GSA/Geology anchors, then cite the
current Geology page you checked.earth-and-planetary-science-letters.nature-geoscience.communications-earth-and-environment.geophysical-research-letters.earth-system-science-data.[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Geology (GSA)
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest geoscience topics>
[Broad significance] <why a wide geoscience audience should care, in one line>
[Fits-the-format] <can the result stand within the short-letter limit without over-reach?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <length/figure limits / GSA data repository / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin agriculture-environment-journal-skillsEvaluates manuscript fit for Earth and Planetary Science Letters (EPSL) and provides quantitative process-science criteria, house-style guidance, and desk-reject heuristics.
Assesses manuscript fit for Geophysical Research Letters (GRL), covering framing, method bar, house style, and desk-reject heuristics for Earth and space science papers.
Evaluates whether a research topic fits the Annals of the American Association of Geographers and identifies the appropriate area: Geographic Methods, Human, Nature-Society, Physical, or General Geography.