From academy-of-management-annals-skills
Builds review exhibits for Academy of Management Annals: framework figures, synthesis tables, search/coverage exhibits, and gap matrices. Does not produce regression tables.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/academy-of-management-annals-skills:amann-tables-figuresThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- The synthesis is done and the reader needs to *see* the field at a glance
Annals exhibits summarize and reorganize across the literature; they never present the author's own estimation. The workhorses:
| Exhibit | Purpose | Design notes |
|---|---|---|
| Framework figure | render the organizing spine — typology grid, process model, multi-level architecture | this is usually the review's signature exhibit; it should be restate-able from memory and carry the "new way of seeing the field" |
| Who-studied-what synthesis table | one row per study (or per stream): construct, theory base, method/context, finding, your appraisal | rows ordered by the framework's cells, not chronology; columns let the reader compare comparable work |
| Search / coverage exhibit | a PRISMA-style flow, a search-terms table, or a publications-over-time chart | documents the systematic process from amann-literature-synthesis and pre-empts "why did you omit X?" |
| Agenda / gap matrix | the framework's empty cells laid out as the future-research agenda | turns the generativity of the framework into a concrete, visible roadmap |
amann-literature-synthesis).amann-evidence-standards).If you assemble effect sizes into a quantitative synthesis (forest plot, meta-regression) or a co-citation map, you are doing meta-analysis or bibliometrics, with all their assumptions — comparable constructs, independence, publication-bias diagnostics, weighting. Do this only where the literature genuinely supports it; a spurious pooled magnitude or an over-interpreted co-citation cluster is less honest than a qualitative synthesis table. Annals readers include the methodologists who would catch invalid pooling.
【Exhibit set】<framework figure / synthesis tables / coverage exhibit / agenda matrix>
【Framework figure】encodes the spine + "new way of seeing"; restate-able from memory? Y/N
【Synthesis table】rows by framework cell; comparable constructs only? Y/N
【Appraisal column】present for every finding? Y/N
【Coverage exhibit】documents the systematic search (PRISMA-style)? Y/N
【Meta/bibliometric】pools only commensurable work (or omitted)? Y/N
【Sourcing】every cell traces to the coding matrix? Y/N
【Next skill】→ amann-writing-style (weave exhibits into the synthesis prose)
Builds summary who-found-what tables, conceptual framework figures, and meta-evidence exhibits for Annual Review of Sociology review papers.
Generates three exhibit types for Annual Review of Economics (ARE) reviews: who-found-what summary tables, conceptual/framework figures, and meta-evidence exhibits that synthesize across studies.
Designs summary tables and conceptual figures for Annual Review of Psychology reviews, including who-found-what tables and framework diagrams that organize the literature.
npx claudepluginhub brycewang-stanford/awesome-journal-skills --plugin academy-of-management-annals-skills