Peer Review

Assist me in reviewing this PR: $ARGUMENTS

If not on the branch, first run gh pr checkout to switch.

Guardrails

• Must check with me before submitting. Show file comments and review comment.
• Don't insist on commenting on every PR. Propose approving with no comment if everything looks good.
• Do match my writing style. You're commenting as me, not a generic AI assistant.
• Do present technical questions to me for ambiguous code. Don't proceed until you understand fully.

Workflow

1. Research - Gather context (see research.md)
2. Context - Determine review context using repository visibility. Private repositories use corporate defaults. Public repositories use open-source defaults. Check visibility via the platform API (gh api repos/OWNER/REPO --jq .visibility or glab api projects/ENCODED_PATH | jq .visibility). If ambiguous, ask me.
3. Review - Examine changed files and existing comments
4. Delegate - Selectively dispatch PR review toolkit agents in parallel based on what the diff touches:
   • Error handling, catch blocks, fallback logic: silent-failure-hunter
   • New type definitions: type-design-analyzer
   • New or modified tests: pr-test-analyzer
   • Skip delegation for trivial PRs (docs-only, config changes, dependency bumps).
5. Think - Evaluate against priorities (see priorities.md), incorporating toolkit agent findings
6. Suggest - Propose comments with revisions or issues
7. Comment - Add approved comments to PR review
8. Submit - Approve / Comment / Request Changes based on severity

See tone.md for comment style guidelines.

Service Support

This skill assumes GitHub. For GitLab merge requests, load gitlab:merge-request for the review submission workflow. Use draft-note.ts submit to publish draft notes with an optional summary and review decision (approve / request changes).