From minister
Computes DORA delivery-performance metrics from git and GitHub API. Use when assessing deployment frequency, lead time, or change failure rate.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/minister:dora-metricsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Compute the four DORA delivery-performance metrics (Deployment
Compute the four DORA delivery-performance metrics (Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, and Time to Restore Service) from local git history and the GitHub API. Classify each metric into Elite, High, Medium, or Low using thresholds from DORA's State of DevOps research, and surface the single weakest dimension as the next improvement target.
minister:release-health-gates.Run the helper script with the desired window:
python3 -m minister.dora_metrics --window 30 --branch main
Read the output: per-metric value, tier classification, and the bottleneck pointer.
For agentic-workflow audits, run the same window twice. Once
filtering to AI-authored PRs (e.g., --failure-label ai-bug),
once across all PRs. Compare the CFR delta. See
modules/agentic-workflow-signals.md.
Optionally pipe --json into the tracker so trend data persists
alongside release-health-gates snapshots.
Optionally render trend charts with kuva when reviewing multiple windows or comparing before/after an agentic-workflow change:
# Collect weekly snapshots into a TSV, then plot all four metrics
# week<TAB>metric<TAB>value
kuva line trends.tsv --x week --y value --color-by metric \
--title "DORA trends (30-day windows)" -o dora-trends.svg
# Quick terminal preview without writing a file
kuva line trends.tsv --x week --y value --color-by metric --terminal
kuva reads TSV/CSV from stdin or a file path. Install once:
cargo install kuva --features cli. No project source changes
required. See kuva for the
full plot-type reference.
| Flag | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
--window | 30 | Measurement window in days |
--branch | HEAD | Production branch |
--failure-label | bug | GitHub label marking prod failures |
--json | off | Emit JSON instead of human-readable |
--repo-path | cwd | Repository directory |
A short text report or JSON payload with:
4.2/day, 2.1 hours, 8%).See modules/thresholds.md for the complete table. Brief summary:
| Metric | Elite | High | Medium | Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | >= 1/day | >= 1/week | >= 1/month | < 1/month |
| LT | <= 1 day | <= 1 week | <= 1 month | > 1 month |
| CFR | <= 15% | <= 30% | <= 45% | > 45% |
| TRS | < 1 hour | < 1 day | < 1 week | >= 1 week |
Confirm a DORA report is real by re-running the script over a
narrower window and checking that DF and LT scale predictably. For
CFR and TRS, sample two or three of the contributing GitHub issues
and verify the bug (or chosen) label is correct on each.
Unit tests live in
plugins/minister/tests/unit/test_dora_metrics.py. Each tier
boundary is exercised at the threshold, so future contributors who
adjust an inequality (> vs >=) trigger a failure rather than a
silent regression. Add new tests at the threshold when extending
classification logic.
npx claudepluginhub athola/claude-night-market --plugin ministerThis skill should be used whenever the user asks about engineering metrics, software delivery performance, or team productivity data — including PR statistics, DORA metrics (deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, recovery time), code coverage, CI/CD health, build success rates, flaky or failing tests, retest patterns, PR cycle time (coding time, pickup time, review time), merge throughput, incidents, or Jira feature tracking. Use this skill even when the user doesn't mention "DevLake" explicitly — any question about "how many PRs", "what's our deploy rate", "which tests are flaky", "compare team metrics", "coverage trends", "build failures", or "change failure rate" should trigger this skill. Also trigger for cross-team comparisons, historical trend analysis, bottleneck identification, and any request to query or analyze engineering data from repositories.
Assesses delivery health using product-type-appropriate metrics: DORA + APEX for software, content delivery metrics for content products, and service/AI-tool metrics for other product types.
Track code review health metrics (cycle time, review participation, defect escape) to improve review process. Use when analyzing review effectiveness.