Skill

code-review-protocol

Structured code review across 5 dimensions — correctness, safety, patterns, coverage, scope. Verdict-routed to auto-fix or surface.

npx claudepluginhub ansonphong/meta-dev --plugin meta-dev

Invocation

How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both

Slash command

/meta-dev:code-review-protocol

User invocable

Model invocable

Inline context

Default effort

Context Preview

The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill

Five-dimension review. Input: diff, list of changed files. Output: verdict + routing.

Supporting Files

references/review-dimensions.mdreferences/verdict-routing.md

SKILL.md

35 lines · ~319 tokens

Similar Skills

receiving-code-review

221.0k

Guides technical evaluation of code review feedback: read fully, restate for understanding, verify against codebase, respond with reasoning or pushback before implementing.

superpowers

Stats

LanguageShell

Parent stars0

MaintenanceGood

Last CommitMay 15, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Help us improve

Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.

Stats

Actions

Help us improve

Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.

Code Review Protocol

Five-dimension review. Input: diff, list of changed files. Output: verdict + routing.

Dimensions

Correctness — Does it work? Logic errors, race conditions, off-by-one, type mismatches.

Safety — Edge cases, auth bypass, data leakage, injection, money-path errors.

Patterns — Follows project conventions? Naming, error handling, logging, module structure.

Coverage — Tests added/updated? Edge cases covered? Snapshot drift explained?

Scope — Touches only declared files? No drive-by changes.

See references/review-dimensions.md for full rubric.

Procedure

Load changed files and diff

Score each dimension: pass / needs_fix / needs_review

Map to action per references/verdict-routing.md

If needs_fix with suggested fix → dispatch fix-agent per routing table

If needs_review → write finding to inbox

Verdict

Meaning

pass

No issues found

needs_fix

Specific fixable issue (with suggested change)

needs_review

Structural concern, needs human judgment