From miller
Use when tracing Miller bridge paths in supported providers: dotnet-web URL literals and fetch/axios client requests to ASP.NET signals, client requests to Next.js route handlers or Nuxt server routes, Next.js/Nuxt route references to file routes, Vue/React references to route definitions, or backend-http client requests to Express/FastAPI/Flask/Django/Spring/Go/gin/echo/Rails/NestJS/Laravel/Phoenix/axum/actix/Symfony/Ktor route facts.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/miller:miller-bridge-trace<clientcall,URL,route,endpoint,DTO,entity,ortable>This skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Miller bridge tracing is provider-scoped evidence, not generic semantic magic. Current providers are `dotnet-web`
Miller bridge tracing is provider-scoped evidence, not generic semantic magic. Current providers are dotnet-web
(TypeScript/JavaScript/Vue URL literals and fetch/axios client requests to ASP.NET endpoints — annotation,
minimal-API, and attribute-route facts — plus DTOs, entities, and EF/table signals), nextjs (route references
to Next.js file routes), nextjs-api (fetch/axios client requests to Next.js App Router route handlers), nuxt
(NuxtLink route references to Nuxt file routes), nuxt-api (fetch/axios client requests to Nitro server routes),
vue (route references to Vue route definitions), react (route references to React route definitions), and
backend-http (fetch/axios/requests/httpx/net/http/Net::HTTP/Ktor/Guzzle/Http-facade/Req/reqwest
client requests — spanning python/go/java/ruby/vue and, since julie-extract 2.8.0, kotlin/php/elixir/rust beyond
js/ts; julie-extract 2.16.0 adds the deferred client families OkHttp/Retrofit/Spring WebClient/RestTemplate
(Kotlin), Symfony HttpClient/cURL (PHP), Tesla/HTTPoison/Finch/:httpc (Elixir), and hyper/ureq (Rust), all
generic over the fact's client label — to Express/Fastify/FastAPI/Flask/Django/Spring (Java and Kotlin)/Go
net/http/gin/echo/Rails/NestJS/Laravel/Phoenix/axum/actix/Symfony/Ktor route facts, with cross-file mount-prefix
composition and rails/laravel/phoenix resource-route expansion).
search(query="<URL, route, method, controller, DTO, entity, or table>")
search(query="<route text>", regions="string_literal")
For Next.js/Nuxt and Vue/React navigation bridges, links require matching route-reference facts plus file-route or route-definition structural facts. If target facts look missing, check patterns before assuming bridge support:
patterns(operation="search", query="nextjs")
patterns(operation="search", query="nuxt")
patterns(operation="search", query="vue")
patterns(operation="search", query="react")
patterns(operation="search", query="route")
For the HTTP boundary bridges (dotnet-web client requests, nextjs-api, nuxt-api, backend-http), audit the
HTTP boundary fact families directly:
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="http.client_request.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="aspnet.attribute_route.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="nextjs.route_handler.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="nuxt.server_route.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="express.route.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="fastapi.route.v1")
patterns(operation="search", pattern_id="rails.resource_route.v1")
inspect(target="<symbol>", depth="full")
trace(target="<anchor>", mode="bridge")
If the anchor name is ambiguous but you know the file, pass scope instead of doing a JSON search for the id:
trace(target="<symbol>", mode="bridge", scope="<file>")
Unsupported-provider or no-link bridge results include Next: / JSON next_actions. Follow those fallbacks
before calling the bridge absent: usually patterns(query="route"), trace(mode="refs"), or
search(mode="source"), depending on the output.
trace(target="<from>", mode="path", to="<to>")
trace(target="<from>", mode="bridge")
[verb-unknown] means the URL matched but HTTP verb evidence is reduced.[ambiguous] means multiple plausible links exist.nextjs and nuxt cover route references to file routes; vue and react cover route references to route
definitions. nextjs-api and nuxt-api claim source-attested Next.js App Router route handlers and Nuxt Nitro
server routes from fetch/axios client requests: High on verb match (client verbs are always known — attested or
the fetch/axios spec-default GET), Medium [verb-unknown] against suffix-less Nuxt handlers, no edge on verb
mismatch or ambiguous route matches. Server actions, middleware rewrites/redirects, runtime route rules,
conventional (non-attribute) ASP.NET routing, relative/absolute client URLs (only url_kind=path is bridged),
and Nuxt $fetch/useFetch still need extractor facts before bridge can claim them.backend-http joins client requests to Express/Fastify/FastAPI/Flask/Django/Spring (Java + Kotlin)/Go
net/http/gin/echo/Rails and (julie-extract 2.8.0) NestJS/Laravel/Phoenix/axum/actix route facts: High on verb
match, Medium [verb-unknown] against a verb-less handler (app.all, gin/echo Any, a method-less
@RequestMapping, actix web::route(), axum any, NestJS @All, every Django URLconf), no edge on verb
mismatch or an equally-specific tie. Cross-file mounts (app.use/include_router/blueprint/url_include/
axum .nest/actix .configure/phoenix forward) and rails/laravel/phoenix resources/resource/apiResource
compose or expand additively, but mounts only on an unambiguous single-file anchor. It does NOT claim regex-form
Django url patterns, rails.mount engine internals, target-less laravel.route_prefix closures, or
non-literal/dynamic route templates (interpolated/format!/heredoc args stay silent upstream).State:
dotnet-web, nextjs, nextjs-api, nuxt, nuxt-api, vue, react, backend-http, or a combinationDo not present bridge output as all-language or all-stack support. It is evidence for the selected provider only.
npx claudepluginhub anortham/miller --plugin millerGuides completion of development work by verifying tests, detecting environment, and presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup.
Enforces test-driven development: write failing test first, then minimal code to pass. Use when implementing features or bugfixes.
Guides creation and editing of skills using test-driven development with pressure scenarios and subagents to verify agent compliance.