From discovery
Audit and improve AI coding-agent configuration. Use when reviewing or changing Claude Code, Pi, Codex, skill, agent, hook, MCP, permission, package, or generated-export setup. Default is review-only; fixes require explicit user approval or --fix. NOT for score-only instruction review or prompt lint; use reviewing-instructions. NOT for application config, git hygiene, code bugs, ordinary docs, or generated files without their source.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/discovery:evolving-config [--fix] [scope][--fix] [scope]sonnetThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Audit AI coding-agent configuration with local evidence first. Default to
Audit AI coding-agent configuration with local evidence first. Default to
review-only. Apply fixes only when the user explicitly asks or passes --fix.
references/RUBRIC.md for shared review dimensions and severity.references/platforms/claude-code.md for Claude Code surfaces.references/platforms/codex.md for Codex surfaces.references/platforms/pi.md for Pi surfaces.references/apply-fixes.md only in approved fix mode.Review-only is the default for prompts such as "review my config", "audit config", "check setup", or "what should I improve".
Fix mode starts only when the user explicitly asks for changes or passes --fix.
Even then, ask before changing permissions, sandbox policy, hooks, MCP servers,
model routing, package installs, deletes, moves, broad rewrites, private config,
or managed settings.
Review AI-agent config only:
CLAUDE.md, skills, agents, commands, hooks, MCP, permissions.AGENTS.md, profiles, sandbox, approvals, MCP, skills, subagents.Do not review app runtime config, git hook hygiene, product docs, source-code quality, or generated output as the source of truth.
Flag these first:
## Config Audit
Scope: <platforms/files>
Mode: review-only | fix-approved
Sources: <local files and docs checked>
Confidence: high | medium | low
### Summary
- Files reviewed: N
- Generated files skipped: N
- Main risk: <one sentence>
### Critical
- `path:line` — issue. Evidence: <fact>. Fix: <action>.
### Important
- `path:line` — issue. Evidence: <fact>. Fix: <action>.
### Suggested
- `path:line` — issue. Evidence: <fact>. Fix: <action>.
### Working Well
- <config that should stay as-is>
### Verification
- <command run or recommended>
Omit empty severity sections. If no findings are confirmed, say No confirmed findings.
npx claudepluginhub alexei-led/cc-thingz --plugin discoveryGuides creation and editing of skills using test-driven development with pressure scenarios and subagents to verify agent compliance.
Guides collaborative design exploration before implementation: explores context, asks clarifying questions, proposes approaches, and writes a design doc for user approval.
Creates structured, bite-sized implementation plans from specs or requirements before writing code. Useful for breaking down multi-step tasks into testable steps with file structure and task boundaries.