Skill

create-comparison

Create a comparison article (X vs Y) that helps readers choose.

Install

npx claudepluginhub airopshq/airops-claude-plugin --plugin AirOps

Tool Access

This skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.

Preview

Create a comparison article: $ARGUMENTS

SKILL.md

Similar Skills

cache-components

Guides Next.js Cache Components and Partial Prerendering (PPR) with cacheComponents enabled. Implements 'use cache', cacheLife(), cacheTag(), revalidateTag(), static/dynamic optimization, and cache debugging.

cache-components

139.1k

claude-opus-4-5-migration

2 files

Migrates code, prompts, and API calls from Claude Sonnet 4.0/4.5 or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5, updating model strings on Anthropic, AWS, GCP, Azure platforms.

claude-opus-4-5-migration

83.2k

claude-code-plugin-release

1 file

Automates semantic versioning and release workflow for Claude Code plugins: bumps versions in package.json, marketplace.json, plugin.json; verifies builds; creates git tags, GitHub releases, changelogs.

claude-mem

64.7k

Stats

Stars0

Forks0

Last CommitFeb 8, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

Create a comparison article: $ARGUMENTS

1. Research

Research both subjects thoroughly.

For each subject: official features and pricing, user reviews, common complaints and praises, use cases where each excels
Existing comparison posts (what they cover, what's missing)
Brand knowledge base for relevant positioning
What matters most to the target audience

2. Outline

Create the comparison framework.

H1: Subject A vs Subject B with benefit for audience
Quick verdict (TL;DR for audience — who should choose what)
What is Subject A? / What is Subject B?
4-6 comparison dimensions (features, ease of use, pricing, integrations, support, scalability, security)
Pricing comparison
Which should you choose? (nuanced recommendation)
FAQ

Apply bias if specified: neutral (balanced), favor_a, or favor_b — while being fair.

Target word count. Checkpoint to review outline before drafting if the user wants it.

3. Draft

Write the full comparison.

Delegate to the content-writer agent for a fresh context window
Follow outline structure; use specific facts and cite sources
Use comparison tables for head-to-head sections
Tone: expert and opinionated but fair; acknowledge strengths; recommend competitor when genuinely better; be transparent if we have a stake
Verify pricing current; fact-check feature claims; ensure both get fair treatment

4. Finalize

Review and create final deliverable.

Run the content-critic agent to validate brand voice
Final checks: fair treatment, all claims verified, nuanced verdict
Full article in markdown, title tag, meta description, recommended slug, "Last verified: [date]" note