From aidd-refine
Reviews completed work for correctness against an agreed plan, classifying findings as deal-breakers, suggestions, or correct with a confidence score. Use to catch errors, gaps, and oversights before shipping.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/aidd-refine:02-challengeThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Rethink prior work and surface what is wrong, missing, or duplicated. Output a structured report with a confidence score so the user knows whether to ship, iterate, or rework.
Rethink prior work and surface what is wrong, missing, or duplicated. Output a structured report with a confidence score so the user knows whether to ship, iterate, or rework.
| # | Action | Role | Input |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | challenge | Rethink prior work, classify findings, score confidence | review_target + agreed_plan |
Single action skill. The router dispatches to challenge whenever the trigger phrases above appear.
## Outputs block.@references/confidence-rubric.md: tiered rubric for the confidence percentage.npx claudepluginhub ai-driven-dev/framework --plugin aidd-refinePerforms multi-agent review of implementation plans using PoLL consensus protocol. Independent expert panels surface diverse issues and blind spots before coding.
Reviews and validates plans (implementation, research, design, migration, etc.) using parallel subagents for codebase alignment, best practices, standards, feasibility, and fresh perspectives.
Performs iterative swarm review of plans or code using parallel agents in 4 escalating rounds to find issues missed by single-pass review. Use for plans >500 lines, >3 components, or code audits.