From ecc
Guides systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews with search planning, source screening, deduplication, and evidence logging for academic or technical topics.
npx claudepluginhub aaione/everything-claude-code-zh --plugin everything-claude-codeThis skill uses the workspace's default tool permissions.
Use this skill when the task is to find, screen, synthesize, and cite a body of
Synthesizes existing knowledge on topics, identifies research gaps, and traces evolution of scientific ideas via systematic literature reviews using academic databases.
Conducts systematic literature reviews: scopes research questions, searches arXiv/Semantic Scholar/Google Scholar, screens/extracts/synthesizes papers, identifies gaps. For research surveys and related work.
Conducts systematic literature reviews across PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar; synthesizes findings into markdown/PDFs with verified citations (APA, Vancouver). For meta-analyses, research synthesis.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Use this skill when the task is to find, screen, synthesize, and cite a body of academic or technical literature.
Ask the user which level of rigor is needed. If unspecified, default to a scoping review for exploratory work and a systematic review for publication or clinical claims.
Convert the prompt into a searchable research question.
For clinical or biomedical work, use PICO:
For technical work, use:
Create a search protocol before collecting sources:
Minimum useful database set:
Keep a search log that makes the review reproducible:
| Database | Date searched | Query | Filters | Results | Export |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: | --- |
| PubMed | 2026-05-11 | `("CRISPR"[tiab] OR "Cas9"[tiab]) AND "sickle cell"[tiab]` | 2020:2026, English | 86 | PMID list |
| arXiv | 2026-05-11 | `CRISPR sickle cell gene editing` | q-bio, 2020:2026 | 9 | BibTeX |
Save raw IDs, URLs, DOIs, abstracts, and notes separately from the final prose.
Deduplicate in this order:
Record how many duplicates were removed.
Screen in stages:
For systematic work, record exclusion reasons:
Use a structured extraction table:
| Study | Design | Population/Data | Method | Comparator | Outcome | Key finding | Limitations |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Author Year | RCT/cohort/review/etc. | sample or corpus | method | baseline | measured outcome | result | caveat |
For technical papers, include dataset, benchmark, metric, baseline, and reproducibility notes.
Group evidence by theme rather than summarizing papers one by one.
Useful synthesis lenses:
Separate claims by confidence:
Before finalizing:
# Literature Review: <Topic>
Generated: <date>
Review type: <narrative | scoping | systematic | meta-analysis>
Search window: <dates>
Databases: <list>
## Research Question
## Search Strategy
## Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
## Evidence Summary
## Thematic Synthesis
## Gaps and Limitations
## References
## Search Log