Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
From vault-pkm
Creates and edits notes in PKM vault using templates for ADR, research, tasks, meetings; duplicate checks via semantic search, link discovery, annotations, index updates.
npx claudepluginhub adrianv101/obsidian-pkm-plugin --plugin obsidian-pkmHow this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/vault-pkm:pkm-writeThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Follow these steps when creating new notes. When running as a subagent, the delegation prompt provides the note topic and project context.
Manages Obsidian vault as developer knowledge base: create/search/update notes with standard frontmatter, organize by projects/technologies/Claude Code, auto-capture commits/tasks/components.
Manages Obsidian vaults: search, create, edit, move Markdown notes; handle YAML frontmatter, wikilinks, backlinks, daily notes, Zettelkasten setup, and sync via obsidian-cli.
Provides persistent Obsidian vault memory for coding agents. Auto-orients sessions with TODOs and project overviews, supports lookup of notes/patterns, and writes discoveries using commands like init, lookup, note.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Follow these steps when creating new notes. When running as a subagent, the delegation prompt provides the note topic and project context.
Before creating, search for existing notes on the same topic:
vault_semantic_search({ query: "<topic/title of intended note>", limit: 5 })
If vault_semantic_search is unavailable (no VAULT_PKM_OPENAI_KEY), use vault_search with the note's title and key terms, and vault_query with matching tags to check for duplicates.
Route based on results. Note on score interpretation: vault_semantic_search uses text-embedding-3-large (3072-dim) cosine similarity, which compresses hard. Even a verbatim title/heading of an existing note typically scores around 0.55–0.65 against that note; scores above 0.7 are essentially never observed. Read the scores with that scale in mind.
vault_read and confirm it's actually about the same topic before routing — a 0.5 score can be a real duplicate or a same-domain neighbor. If it IS the same topic: update the existing note instead of creating a new one — vault_append to add new content or vault_edit to refine existing content; vault_update_frontmatter if metadata changed. Skip to Step 4 (Discover Connections) after updating. If it's a same-domain neighbor (related but distinct topic), treat as a partial match.Use vault_write with the appropriate template. Select the template and path based on content type:
| Content Type | Template | Default Path |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture decision | adr | <project>/development/decisions/ADR-NNN-{title}.md |
| Research finding | research-note | <project>/research/{title}.md |
| Bug investigation | troubleshooting-log | <project>/development/debug/{title}.md |
| Reusable knowledge | permanent-note | 03-Resources/Development/{title}.md |
| Task | task | <project>/tasks/{title}.md |
| Meeting record | meeting-notes | <project>/planning/{title}.md |
| Literature/article notes | literature-note | 03-Resources/{title}.md |
Where <project> is the vault project path (e.g., 01-Projects/MyApp). Determine from the delegation prompt, CLAUDE.md # PKM: annotation, or SessionStart hook context.
Notes in 03-Resources/ should be written as project-agnostic knowledge — useful regardless of where the insight originated. Use frontmatter tags or ## Related links to trace the origin project, but write the content for a general audience.
If CLAUDE.md specifies a different location for a content type, use that instead.
vault_write({
template: "<template>",
path: "<path-from-table>",
frontmatter: { tags: [...], ... }
})
Ensure:
{title} uses kebab-case (e.g., cache-eviction-strategies)vault_list on the decisions directory to determine the next NNN numbervault_write creates a skeleton from the template — headings with HTML comment placeholders and empty bullets. You must fill in the actual content.
vault_read to see the exact template outputvault_edit, using the exact text from the read output as old_stringWork section by section. Each vault_edit call must match text exactly as it appears in the file — do NOT guess what the template produced.
For templates with many sections, you can batch multiple sections into fewer edits by using a larger old_string that spans consecutive sections.
Don't forget the link sections. Templates include link sections like ## Related, ## Links, and ## References with their own placeholder block — an HTML comment plus an empty bullet. The exact comment text varies per template (e.g., <!-- Format: - [[note-name]] — relationship explanation --> in most templates, <!-- External references: docs, articles, repos --> in research-note's ## Links). Read the file first to get the exact placeholder text, then vault_edit to remove it. vault_add_links in Step 6 appends new links below whatever already exists in the section — it does not replace the placeholder, so leftover stubs end up sitting above the real links.
Run vault_suggest_links on the new note to find related content:
vault_suggest_links({ path: "<path-to-new-note>", limit: 8 })
Select the top 3–5 most relevant suggestions.
If vault_suggest_links is unavailable (no OPENAI_API_KEY), use vault_search with key terms from the note's title/topic and vault_query with matching tags to manually identify good link targets.
If no suggestions are returned (new vault or isolated topic), skip Steps 5–7 — the note's ## Related section will be filled as the graph grows.
Well-linked-existing-note carve-out (UPDATE path only). If you arrived here via the Step 1 UPDATE branch and the existing note's ## Related already covers the connections you would otherwise add — i.e., the top suggestions from vault_suggest_links are already linked, or are clearly weaker than what's already there — skip Steps 5–7. Forcing additional links to a note that's already well-curated degrades link quality. This carve-out applies only to UPDATE; new notes always work through Steps 5–7.
For each selected link, write a one-line annotation explaining the relationship.
Good annotations use specific relationship language:
Bad: - [[note]] — related to this topic
Good: - [[architecture-patterns]] — foundational patterns this decision builds on
Use the note's content, shared tags, and conversation context to produce meaningful explanations.
Add annotated links to the note using vault_add_links:
vault_add_links({
path: "<path-to-new-note>",
links: [
{ target: "<vault-relative-path>", annotation: "relationship explanation" },
{ target: "<vault-relative-path>", annotation: "relationship explanation" }
]
})
The tool handles deduplication (skips already-linked targets), creates ## Related if missing, and validates targets exist. Format annotations as specific relationship language (see Step 5).
If the note uses a non-standard section (e.g., ## References), pass section: "## References".
If the template does not include a ## Related section, vault_add_links will create it automatically (default create_section: true). Templates with ## Related built in: adr, permanent-note, research-note, troubleshooting-log, literature-note, moc, meeting-notes.
Note: MOC notes created before this version may use ## Related Topics instead of ## Related. If vault_add_links fails with "Section not found", try section: "## Related Topics".
For significant note types (ADR, permanent-note, research-note, troubleshooting-log, literature-note, moc, meeting-notes):
## Related section using vault_add_linksSkip for ephemeral types (fleeting-note, daily-note) — Obsidian's native backlinks panel is sufficient.
_index.md_index.md references it where appropriateGuidelines for edits, appends, and frontmatter updates. These don't require the full creation workflow above.
[[note#heading]] wikilinks pointing to itvault_suggest_links to discover new connections worth addingvault_append({ heading: "## Sessions", position: "after_heading" }) for reverse-chronological orderingheading param to insert in the right location rather than appending at EOFvault_update_frontmatter over vault_edit for YAML fields — it parses and re-serializes safelytype, created, tags) can be updated but not removedstatus must be pending/active/done/cancelled, priority must be low/normal/high/urgent