From agi-super-team
Guides system-level architecture decisions: monolith/microservices/serverless, scaling, resilience, data consistency, and migration.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/agi-super-team:software-architecture-designThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use this skill for **system-level design decisions** rather than implementation details within a single service or component.
assets/operations/scalability-checklist.mdassets/patterns/event-driven-template.mdassets/patterns/microservices-template.mdassets/planning/adr-template.mdassets/planning/architecture-blueprint.mddata/sources.jsonreferences/api-gateway-service-mesh.mdreferences/architecture-trends-2026.mdreferences/data-architecture-patterns.mdreferences/migration-modernization-guide.mdreferences/modern-patterns.mdreferences/operational-playbook.mdreferences/scalability-reliability-guide.mdUse this skill for system-level design decisions rather than implementation details within a single service or component.
| Task | Pattern/Tool | Key Resources | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose architecture style | Layered, Microservices, Event-driven, Serverless | modern-patterns.md | Greenfield projects, major refactors |
| Design for scale | Load balancing, Caching, Sharding, Read replicas | scalability-reliability-guide.md | High-traffic systems, performance goals |
| Ensure resilience | Circuit breakers, Retries, Bulkheads, Graceful degradation | scalability-reliability-guide.md | Distributed systems, external dependencies |
| Document decisions | Architecture Decision Record (ADR) | adr-template.md | Major technical decisions, tradeoff analysis |
| Define service boundaries | Domain-Driven Design (DDD), Bounded contexts | microservices-template.md | Microservices decomposition |
| Model data consistency | ACID vs BASE, Event sourcing, CQRS, Saga patterns | data-architecture-patterns.md | Multi-service transactions |
| Plan observability | SLIs/SLOs/SLAs, Distributed tracing, Metrics, Logs | architecture-blueprint.md | Production readiness |
| Migrate from monolith | Strangler fig, Database decomposition, Shadow traffic | migration-modernization-guide.md | Legacy modernization |
| Design inter-service comms | API Gateway, Service mesh, BFF pattern | api-gateway-service-mesh.md | Microservices networking |
Invoke when working on:
Use other skills instead for:
Project needs: [New System or Major Refactor]
├─ Single team, evolving domain?
│ ├─ Start simple → Modular Monolith (clear module boundaries)
│ └─ Need rapid iteration → Layered Architecture
│
├─ Multiple teams, clear bounded contexts?
│ ├─ Independent deployment critical → Microservices
│ └─ Shared data model → Modular Monolith with service modules
│
├─ Event-driven workflows?
│ ├─ Asynchronous processing → Event-Driven Architecture (Kafka, queues)
│ └─ Complex state machines → Saga pattern + Event Sourcing
│
├─ Variable/unpredictable load?
│ ├─ Pay-per-use model → Serverless (AWS Lambda, Cloudflare Workers)
│ └─ Batch processing → Serverless + queues
│
└─ High consistency requirements?
├─ Strong ACID guarantees → Monolith or Modular Monolith
└─ Distributed data → CQRS + Event Sourcing
Decision Factors:
See references/modern-patterns.md for detailed pattern descriptions.
The references in this skill are background knowledge for you — absorb the patterns and present them as your own expertise. Do not cite internal reference file names (e.g., "from data-architecture-patterns.md") in user-facing output. Users don't know these files exist.
Every architecture recommendation should include:
Use this workflow when a user asks for architecture recommendations, decomposition, or major platform decisions.
Preferred deliverables (pick what fits the request):
assets/planning/architecture-blueprint.mdassets/planning/adr-template.mdreferences/modern-patterns.md, references/scalability-reliability-guide.mdLoad only when the question explicitly involves current trends, vendor-specific constraints, or "what's the latest thinking on X?"
platform_engineering_2026 — IDP trends, AI-platform convergence, Backstageoptional_ai_architecture — RAG patterns, multi-agent design, MCP/A2A protocolsmodern_architecture_2025 — Data mesh, composable architecture, continuous architectureIf live web access is available, consult 2–3 authoritative sources from data/sources.json and fold findings into the recommendation. If not, answer with durable patterns and explicitly state assumptions that could change (vendor limits, pricing, managed-service capabilities).
Read at most 2–3 references per question — pick the ones most relevant to the specific ask. Do not read all of them.
| Reference | Contents | When to Read |
|---|---|---|
| modern-patterns.md | 10 architecture patterns with decision trees | Choosing or comparing patterns |
| scalability-reliability-guide.md | CAP theorem, DB scaling, caching, circuit breakers, SRE | Scaling or reliability questions |
| data-architecture-patterns.md | CQRS variants, event sourcing, data mesh, sagas, consistency | Data flow across services |
| migration-modernization-guide.md | Strangler fig, DB decomposition, feature flags, risk assessment | Refactoring a monolith |
| api-gateway-service-mesh.md | Gateway patterns, service mesh, mTLS, observability | Inter-service communication |
| architecture-trends-2026.md | Platform engineering, data mesh, AI-native systems | Current trends only |
| operational-playbook.md | Architecture questions framework, decomposition heuristics | Design discussion framing |
Planning & Documentation (assets/planning/):
Architecture Patterns (assets/patterns/):
Operations (assets/operations/):
npx claudepluginhub aaaaqwq/agi-super-team --plugin agi-super-teamRecommends monolith, modular monolith, microservices, or serverless architectures based on team size, scale, and constraints for new systems or migrations.
Designs system architectures, evaluates monolith vs microservices, creates diagrams, analyzes dependencies, chooses databases, plans scalability, makes technical decisions, and reviews designs using ADRs.
Designs software architectures evaluating monolith/microservices/serverless/event-driven/CQRS/hexagonal patterns; generates C4 diagrams, ADRs, bounded contexts, and quality analysis.