By Rune-kit
Orchestrate an end-to-end software development lifecycle from planning, coding, testing, and deployment to monitoring and incident response, with built-in security gates, code quality audits, and multi-agent parallel execution.
Lie detector for agent claims — validates every completion claim has actual evidence. Default-FAIL mindset. Use as final gate before merge/commit.
Performance regression gate — detects N+1 queries, sync-in-async, missing indexes, memory leaks, bundle bloat. Investigate only, does NOT fix. Use before commit or deploy.
Create structured implementation plans. Produces master plan + phase files for non-trivial work (3+ phases, 5+ files). Use before multi-phase implementation.
Pre-commit quality gate — catches 'almost right' code. Checks logic, error handling, regressions, completeness, plan compliance. BLOCK verdict stops commit.
Structured reasoning — applies McKinsey-grade frameworks (5 Whys, Fishbone, First Principles, SCAMPER) with mandatory bias detection. Use for complex multi-factor problems, not simple linear analysis.
Pre-implementation red-team analysis. Use when a plan is high-risk, critical path, or expensive to reverse. Challenges plans before code is written — finds edge cases, security holes, scalability bottlenecks, error propagation risks, and integration conflicts. Catches flaws at plan time (10x cheaper than post-implementation).
Creates code-based visual assets — SVG icons, OG image HTML templates, social banners, and icon sets. Use when generating visuals as code (vector/HTML), NOT raster images — for raster generation see @rune-pro/media. Outputs files with usage instructions.
Comprehensive project audit — security, dependencies, code quality, architecture, performance, infra, docs, and mesh analytics. Use when needing a full 8-dimension health-score snapshot before a major release, M&A diligence, or quarterly review. Delegates to specialist skills (sentinel, dependency-doctor, perf, autopsy, etc.).
Full codebase health assessment. Use when diagnosing project health or starting a rescue workflow on legacy code — OR when evaluating an external GitHub repo for dependency / fork / contribution decisions (--external mode). Analyzes complexity, dependencies, dead code, tech debt, and git hotspots. Produces a health score and rescue plan.
Business Analyst agent. Use when starting a new feature requiring requirements elicitation BEFORE plan or cook. Asks probing questions, identifies hidden requirements, maps stakeholders, defines scope boundaries, and produces a structured Requirements Document that plan and cook consume.
Executes bash commands
Hook triggers when Bash tool is used
Modifies files
Hook triggers on file write and edit operations
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
No model invocation
Executes directly as bash, bypassing the AI model
No model invocation
Executes directly as bash, bypassing the AI model
Less skills. Deeper connections.
A lean, interconnected skill ecosystem for AI coding assistants.
64 skills · 203 connections · 40 signals · 13 platforms · MIT
Claude Code (native plugin) · Cursor · Windsurf · Google Antigravity · OpenAI Codex · OpenCode · Aider · GitHub Copilot CLI · Gemini CLI · Qoder · Qwen Coder · any AI IDE
Most skill ecosystems are either too many isolated skills (540+ that don't talk to each other) or rigid pipelines (A → B → C, if B fails everything stops).
Rune is a mesh — 64 skills with 203 connections + 40 signals across a 5-layer architecture. Skills call each other bidirectionally, forming resilient workflows that adapt when things go wrong.
Pipeline: A → B → C → D (B fails = stuck)
Hub-Spoke: A → HUB → C (HUB fails = stuck)
Mesh: A ↔ B ↔ C (B fails = A reaches C via D→E)
↕ ↕
D ↔ E ↔ F
We ran 10 standardized coding tasks on Claude Code — once without Rune (vanilla), once with Rune — and measured tokens, cost, duration, and correctness.
Without Rune With Rune Delta
Avg Tokens: 541,400 454,491 ↓ 16%
Avg Cost: $0.69 $0.65 ↓ 6%
Avg Duration: 2.3 min 2.1 min ↓ 9%
Avg Tool Calls: 14 13 ↓ 7%
Correctness: 9/10 9/10 =
| Task | Difficulty | Tokens | Cost | Duration | Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refactor 450-line component | Medium | -62% | -17% | -32% | -27% |
| Full feature (auth + API + tests) | Complex | -36% | -29% | -31% | -27% |
| Add Zod validation | Easy | -9% | -28% | -32% | 0% |
| Dark mode across 6 components | Hard | ~0% | +10% | -7% | -6% |
Rune doesn't make Claude smarter — Claude already knows how to code. Rune makes Claude disciplined. The more complex the task, the more discipline matters.
"Without Rune, Claude writes code that works. With Rune, Claude writes code that lasts."
| # | Task | Diff | Tokens | Cost | Time | Correct |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zod Validation | Easy | -9% | -28% | -32% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 2 | Fix N+1 Query | Easy | +12% | +25% | +3% | ❌ → ❌ |
| 3 | Cursor Pagination | Med | +12% | +19% | -9% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 4 | Security Review | Med | +13% | +32% | +3% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 5 | Rate Limiting | Med | +12% | +5% | +5% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 6 | Refactor Component | Med | -62% | -17% | -32% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 7 | Dark Mode (6 files) | Hard | ~0% | +10% | -7% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 8 | DB Migration | Hard | +52% | +11% | +49% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 9 | Memory Leak Debug | Hard | +13% | +28% | -2% | ✅ → ✅ |
| 10 | Full Auth System | Complex | -36% | -29% | -31% | ✅ → ✅ |
Methodology: Claude Code CLI headless mode (claude -p --output-format json), 10 tasks with fixture code, pattern-based correctness evaluation. Source: Benchmark/
npx claudepluginhub rune-kit/rune --plugin @rune/analyticsProduction-ready Claude Code configuration with role-based workflows (PM→Lead→Designer→Dev→QA), safety hooks, 44 commands, 19 skills, 8 agents, 43 rules, 30 hook scripts across 19 events, auto-learning pipeline, hook profiles, and multi-language coding standards
Autonomous multi-agent development framework with spec-driven sprints and convergent iteration
Verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. 15 skills across a 5-phase spine (Investigate → Design → Implement → Verify → Ship), 8 specialist agents, an interactive setup wizard. Every skill has rationalizations + evidence requirements. Built for senior ICs and tech leads.
Multi-agent orchestration for code that matters.
Corca Workflow Framework — consolidated hooks and skill orchestration for structured development sessions
Custom commands, skills, agents, rules, hooks, and output styles for Claude Code - session continuity and modern CLI tooling for real-world development workflows