Run structured development workflows — bug fixing, feature implementation, code review, and codebase auditing — with multi-persona review passes, automatic MR creation, and a gardening pass for cleanup.
Resolve every open review finding in one coherent fix pass, then hand back for re-review
Onboard an existing codebase — scaffold GLaDOS state and the manifest, then extract its knowledge
(renamed) the 'autonomous-loop' workflow is now 'run-epic'
Run the codebase critique roundtable and ship one surgical fix MR
Take one feature from selection to a verified, self-reviewed merge request
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimnpx claudepluginhub cruxdigital-llc/crux-marketplace --plugin gladosBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Executables (bin/) — files in this plugin's bin/directory are added to the Bash tool's PATH while the plugin is enabled.
Generative Logic and Documentation Operating System — yes, that GLaDOS. Unlike her namesake, this one writes everything down and lets you leave the testing chamber.
GLaDOS is a library of engineering workflows for AI coding agents — Claude
Code, Gemini CLI (Google's open-source terminal agent), Google Antigravity
(Google's agentic IDE; CLI agy; antigravity.google), and others. You
install it into a project: a small
compiler reads one configuration file in your repo (glados.yaml) and
generates a set of slash commands — /glados:build-feature,
/glados:fix-bug, /glados:review-mr — tailored to that project. When your
agent runs one, it follows a disciplined, team-visible process instead of
improvising: reviews get posted where the team can see them, decisions get
written down with their reasons, and every run leaves a committed record in
your repo.
What you get:
.glados/runs/ that is committed alongside the work.glados.yaml declares who may merge,
which decisions the agent may make on its own, and where each kind of result
gets posted. The installer refuses any configuration under which a result
would silently disappear.Coming from GLaDOS v1? Run python bin/glados.py migrate --target /path/to/your/project instead — MIGRATION.md is the guided
path. Otherwise, from a clone of this repository:
cp glados.yaml.example /path/to/your/project/glados.yaml
Open the copy and set two keys. platform: is gitlab or github. phase:
is a one-word honest answer to "who gets hurt if the agent gets something
wrong?" — nascent (nobody; no users yet), evolving (early adopters),
production (real users), or sunset (winding down) — describe reality, not
ambition, because the word tunes how much caution gets compiled in.
Then install for your agent's runtime (here: Claude Code):
python bin/glados.py install --mode claude --target /path/to/your/project
# modes: claude | claude-plugin | direct | gemini | antigravity | aistudio
The installer prints an assembly report — every configuration value it resolved and where it came from — and writes the commands into your project. Now open your agent inside the project and run your first command:
/glados:adopt-codebase
The agent studies your codebase, writes what it learns (structure,
conventions, candidate coding standards) into product-knowledge/, and leaves
a record of the run in .glados/runs/ — ordinary files you review and commit
like any other change.
Say a user reports a crash and you run /glados:fix-bug. The agent does not
jump straight to editing code: it first reproduces the bug and writes down
how; it fixes the root cause rather than the symptom; then a second, fresh
agent session — one that never saw the fix being written — independently
verifies it. What you end up with is a merge request with the review verdict
posted as a comment on it, plus a committed record in .glados/runs/ saying
what was decided and why. Six months later, git log still knows the whole
story.
fix-bug is one of fifteen commands. The everyday ones are build-feature
(one feature from plan to a verified merge request in one sitting),
review-mr and address-review (the review loop), and run-epic (a whole
ticket queue). The full list, with what each does, is in
docs/workflows.md.
Everything is installed into your project workspace and committed to git:
Multi-agent development workflow (/crew) — planning, implementation, review, documentation, evals, and audit gates. Commands, agents, and skills are auto-discovered from the repo.
Corca Workflow Framework — consolidated hooks and skill orchestration for structured development sessions
Multi-agent orchestration for code that matters.
PROJECT.md-first autonomous development with hybrid auto-fix documentation. 8-agent pipeline, auto-orchestration, docs auto-update on commit (true vibe coding). Knowledge base system with 90% faster repeat research. Strict mode enforces SDLC best practices automatically. Works for ANY Python/JavaScript/TypeScript/Go project.
Agentic Delivery OS - AI-powered software delivery system
Implementation planning, execution, and PR creation workflows with multi-agent collaboration