By jcwleo
Orchestrates a structured Markdown-first coding workflow with automated request routing, TDD enforcement, multi-panel debugging, code review, and verification gates for end-to-end feature delivery.
Turn Oh No Harness skill-selection guidance on, off, or status.
Run bounded three-panel rescue analysis and synthesis.
Install the Oh No Harness developer statusline into Claude Code settings (user-invoked setup).
Clarify vague work into an approval-gated spec.
Execute a concrete plan or task through mode-gated verification.
Use proactively inside active Oh No Harness workflows to analyze requirements and risks; the caller owns approval and handoff gates.
Use proactively inside active Oh No Harness workflows to run the read-only Codex companion call for the opposite-host leg of a cross-host code-reviewer pair; the caller owns approval and handoff gates.
Use proactively inside active Oh No Harness workflows to review changed code or prompts; the caller owns approval and handoff gates.
Use proactively inside active Oh No Harness workflows to run the read-only Codex companion call for the opposite-host leg of a cross-host debugger pair; the caller owns approval and handoff gates.
Use proactively inside active Oh No Harness workflows for root-cause analysis; the caller owns approval and handoff gates.
Use when the user wants to manage Oh No Harness session toggles, such as turning automatic skill-selection guidance on or off, checking routing status, making the bootstrap prompt more or less assertive across sessions, or turning the Codex executor delegation toggle on or off.
Use when a hard problem needs bounded inference-time ensemble analysis, cross-host consultation when available, adversarial critique, fallback-aware synthesis, or escalation from Ralph/systematic-debugging after ordinary analysis stalls.
Use when an idea, product request, feature request, design prompt, or engineering task is vague, broad, ambiguous, missing requirements, constraints, acceptance criteria, or user intent, or would otherwise need clarification before planning or implementation.
Use when implementing or executing an approved plan, PRD, spec, story list, ticket, or concrete task with acceptance criteria, required verification, or multiple implementation steps.
Use when broad, risky, architecture-sensitive, cross-file, multi-step, or unclear work needs consensus implementation planning before coding.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
No model invocation
Executes directly as bash, bypassing the AI model
No model invocation
Executes directly as bash, bypassing the AI model
Based on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub p/jcwleo-oh-no-harness-plugins-oh-no-harnessMulti-agent /workflow development pipeline (planner → plan-review → coder → code-review) with typed handoff contracts, lifecycle hooks, and MCP servers.
Corca Workflow Framework — consolidated hooks and skill orchestration for structured development sessions
Verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. 15 skills across a 5-phase spine (Investigate → Design → Implement → Verify → Ship), 8 specialist agents, an interactive setup wizard. Every skill has rationalizations + evidence requirements. Built for senior ICs and tech leads.
Harness for Claude Code — skills, /harness:* slash commands, persona subagents, lifecycle hooks, and MCP tools without per-repo `harness setup`. Sibling plugins exist for Cursor, Gemini CLI, and Codex.
Agentic workflow mechanics: CLAUDE.md instruction quality and structured context handoff
Claude Code workflow patterns: prompting, CLAUDE.md maintenance, multi-agent orchestration
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claim