Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
Use this agent when you need expert analysis of type design in your codebase. Specifically use it (1) when introducing a new type to ensure it follows best practices for encapsulation and invariant expression, (2) during pull request creation to review all types being added, and (3) when refactoring existing types to improve their design quality. The agent will provide both qualitative feedback and quantitative ratings on encapsulation, invariant expression, usefulness, and enforcement. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Use this agent when you need to review code for adherence to project guidelines, style guides, and best practices. This agent should be used proactively after writing or modifying code, especially before committing changes or creating pull requests. It will check for style violations, potential issues, and ensure code follows the established patterns in CLAUDE.md. Also the agent needs to know which files to focus on for the review. In most cases this will be recently completed work which is unstaged in git (can be retrieved by running git diff). However there can be cases where this is different, make sure to specify this as the agent input when calling the agent. Typical triggers include the user asking for a review of a feature they just implemented, the assistant proactively reviewing its own newly-written code before declaring a task done, and a final pre-PR check before opening a pull request. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Use this agent when code has been written or modified and needs to be simplified for clarity, consistency, and maintainability while preserving all functionality. This agent should be triggered automatically after completing a coding task or writing a logical chunk of code. It simplifies code by following project best practices while retaining all functionality. The agent focuses only on recently modified code unless instructed otherwise. Examples: <example> Context: The assistant has just implemented a new feature that adds user authentication to an API endpoint. user: "Please add authentication to the /api/users endpoint" assistant: "I've implemented the authentication for the /api/users endpoint. Here's the code:" <function call omitted for brevity> <commentary> Since a logical chunk of code has been written (authentication feature), use the Task tool to launch the code-simplifier agent to improve the code's clarity and maintainability while preserving functionality. </commentary> assistant: "Now let me use the code-simplifier agent to refine this implementation for better clarity and maintainability" </example> <example> Context: The assistant has just fixed a bug by adding several conditional checks. user: "Fix the null pointer exception in the data processor" assistant: "I've added the necessary null checks to prevent the exception:" <function call omitted for brevity> <commentary> After modifying code to fix a bug, use the code-simplifier agent to ensure the fix follows best practices and maintains code quality. </commentary> assistant: "Let me refine this bug fix using the code-simplifier agent to ensure it follows our best practices" </example> <example> Context: The assistant has just refactored a function to improve performance. user: "Optimize the data sorting algorithm for better performance" assistant: "I've optimized the sorting algorithm. Here's the updated implementation:" <function call omitted for brevity> <commentary> After completing a performance optimization task, use the code-simplifier agent to ensure the optimized code is also clear and maintainable. </commentary> assistant: "Now I'll use the code-simplifier agent to ensure the optimized code is also clear and follows our coding standards" </example>
Use this agent when you need to analyze code comments for accuracy, completeness, and long-term maintainability. This includes (1) after generating large documentation comments or docstrings, (2) before finalizing a pull request that adds or modifies comments, (3) when reviewing existing comments for potential technical debt or comment rot, and (4) when you need to verify that comments accurately reflect the code they describe. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Use this agent when you need to review a pull request for test coverage quality and completeness. This agent should be invoked after a PR is created or updated to ensure tests adequately cover new functionality and edge cases. Typical triggers include the user asking whether tests on a freshly-created PR are thorough, an updated PR adding new logic that needs coverage analysis, and a final pre-merge double-check before marking a PR ready. See "When to invoke" in the agent body for worked scenarios.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
A curated directory of high-quality plugins for Claude Code.
⚠️ Important: Make sure you trust a plugin before installing, updating, or using it. Anthropic does not control what MCP servers, files, or other software are included in plugins and cannot verify that they will work as intended or that they won't change. See each plugin's homepage for more information.
/plugins - Internal plugins developed and maintained by Anthropic/external_plugins - Third-party plugins from partners and the communityPlugins can be installed directly from this marketplace via Claude Code's plugin system.
To install, run /plugin install {plugin-name}@claude-plugins-official
or browse for the plugin in /plugin > Discover
Internal plugins are developed by Anthropic team members. See /plugins/example-plugin for a reference implementation.
Third-party partners can submit plugins for inclusion in the marketplace. External plugins must meet quality and security standards for approval. To submit a new plugin, use the plugin directory submission form.
Each plugin follows a standard structure:
plugin-name/
├── .claude-plugin/
│ └── plugin.json # Plugin metadata (required)
├── .mcp.json # MCP server configuration (optional)
├── commands/ # Slash commands (optional)
├── agents/ # Agent definitions (optional)
├── skills/ # Skill definitions (optional)
└── README.md # Documentation
Please see each linked plugin for the relevant LICENSE file.
For more information on developing Claude Code plugins, see the official documentation.
npx claudepluginhub haroldhuanrongliu/claude-plugins-official --plugin pr-review-toolkitProduction-grade academic research pipeline for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize. 4 skills, 27 modes, 39-agent ensemble, v3.7.3 + v3.8 L3 claim-faithfulness gate, v3.9.0 cross-index triangulation, v3.10 triangulation policy layer, v3.11 deterministic citation verification gate (#182).
Workflow-builder skill: design and write deterministic multi-agent workflow scripts (.js files in .claude/workflows/) for Claude Code's Workflow tool (CLAUDE_CODE_WORKFLOWS=1, /workflows). Every session opens with an intake question set; when the user is vague, a stdlib recommendation engine infers and proposes a topology with rationale instead of stalling. Ships 3 stdlib Python tools (intake recommendation engine, .js validator enforcing the pure-literal-meta / no-non-determinism / guarded-loop / parallel-thunk rules, topology scaffolder), 3 references citing 7-8 authoritative sources each (full API surface, orchestration patterns, decision + intake guide), templates + a runnable example, cs-workflow-architect persona agent + /cs:workflow-build slash command. Use when building, scaffolding, or running a custom Claude Code workflow or orchestrating sub-agents (fan-out, pipeline, loop, judge-panel).
Generates a curated supplementary reading list from any course syllabus using Consensus academic search. Grill-me intake (syllabus input format + course audience + year range) plus a grouping forcing-options checkpoint before any search runs — so the reading list matches the course's level and recency need. Parses the syllabus to extract topics and learning outcomes, searches Consensus for recent peer-reviewed papers per topic, and produces a professionally formatted .docx with clickable Consensus links, plain-language summaries calibrated to audience level, and Bloom-higher-order discussion questions tied to course learning goals. Triggers whenever a user uploads a syllabus, course outline, or curriculum document and wants supplementary readings. Also triggers on: 'syllabus reading list', 'find papers for my course', 'create a reading list from this syllabus', 'recent research for my class', 'supplementary readings', 'find journal articles for these topics', 'what recent papers cover this material', 'any new research on these course topics', 'update my syllabus with recent papers'. Even casual mentions when a syllabus is attached should trigger this skill.
End-to-end SLO/SLI/error-budget discipline per Google SRE Workbook. Ships SLO designer (refuses to render without required fields), error-budget calculator with multi-window burn-rate alert thresholds (PromQL-shaped), and SLO reviewer that catches the 7 common bugs (target too high, window too short, no SLI definition, CPU-as-SLI, etc.). 4 references on principles + SLI design + error budget math + composition with feature-flags-architect/chaos-engineering/kubernetes-operator. Asset templates for SLO YAML and error budget policy. /slo-design slash command. NOT a generic observability skill.
A disciplined coding pipeline that grounds code in verified structure before a line is written: Discuss -> Map -> Decompose -> Execute -> Verify, with a lazy-senior-dev YAGNI ladder that deletes unnecessary code first. No invented APIs, no assumed imports, no placeholder code. Opt-in for high-stakes, complex, or multi-file work; not for trivial edits. Synthesizes four MIT/open-source projects (Ralph, GSD Core, Graphify, Ponytail).
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
Comprehensive feature development workflow with specialized agents for codebase exploration, architecture design, and quality review
Complete creative writing suite with 10 specialized agents covering the full writing process: research gathering, character development, story architecture, world-building, dialogue coaching, editing/review, outlining, content strategy, believability auditing, and prose style/voice analysis. Includes genre-specific guides, templates, and quality checklists.
Comprehensive skill pack with 66 specialized skills for full-stack developers: 12 language experts (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin, C#, PHP, Java, SQL, JavaScript), 10 backend frameworks, 6 frontend/mobile, plus infrastructure, DevOps, security, and testing. Features progressive disclosure architecture for 50% faster loading.
Upstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
Consult multiple AI coding agents (Gemini, OpenAI, Grok, Perplexity, plus codex, antigravity, and grok CLIs when installed) to get diverse perspectives on coding problems