Evaluate how a feature will be sliced, shipped, and rolled back. Hunt for big-bang delivery risks, missing feature flags, unidentified dependencies, and absent rollback strategies.
Evaluate where a planned feature fits in the overall application structure. Hunt for navigation dead-ends, discoverability gaps, broken mental models, and orphaned features.
Analyze how a planned feature fits with existing codebase patterns, conventions, design systems, and architectural decisions. Deep-dive the codebase to find alignment opportunities and conflicts.
Evaluate whether a plan's problem statement, requirements, and success criteria are clear enough to build against. Hunt for vagueness, missing context, and untestable goals.
Evaluate how a plan approaches component organization, abstraction, and design system alignment. Hunt for premature abstractions, missed reuse opportunities, and organizational patterns that won't scale.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
# Add marketplace
claude plugin marketplace add dev360/claude
# Install plugins
claude plugin install dev@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin install review@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin install debugger@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin install plan@dev360 --scope user
# Pull latest from marketplace
claude plugin marketplace update dev360
# Update individual plugins
claude plugin update dev@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin update review@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin update debugger@dev360 --scope user
claude plugin update plan@dev360 --scope user
Restart Claude after updating.
devInvestigation and self-improvement agents.
reviewCode review via 9 parallel specialized agents. Invoked with /review.
Agents are selected based on change size:
logic, boundary, error-handling, securitydata-flow, contracts, test-gapsidioms, architectureEach agent hunts for specific issues — logic errors, edge cases, missing error handling, security holes, blast radius, breaking API changes, test gaps, non-idiomatic patterns, and code smells. Findings are consolidated with pass/warn/fail verdicts per agent.
planPlan review via 9 parallel specialized agents. Invoked with /plan. Tailored for product engineers.
Agents are selected based on plan scope:
problem, prior-art, technicaluser-journey, ui-ux, deliverystrategy, information-architecture, reusabilityHunts for vague requirements, missing user flows, unspecified interaction states, codebase pattern conflicts, PLG gaps, navigation dead-ends, premature abstractions, delivery risks, and missing rollback strategies. Produces a Definition of Ready checklist and pass/warn/fail verdicts per agent.
debuggerBrowser debugging via Chrome DevTools MCP. Launches a subagent that can navigate pages, click elements, fill forms, monitor network requests, capture console errors, and take screenshots. Used automatically when Claude needs eyes in the browser, or explicitly via /debug.
npx claudepluginhub dev360/claude --plugin planCode review with 9 parallel specialized agents — logic, boundary, error handling, security, data flow, contracts, test gaps, idioms, architecture
Browser debugging and testing via Chrome DevTools
Personal agents and tools
Codex, Gemini, Claude の3つの AI で Plan ファイルを並列レビュー。実装計画の妥当性、抜け漏れ、リスクを分析する
Pre- and post-implementation validation with parallel subagents: /replan validates plans before execution, /recheck verifies implementations match the plan
Iterative plan review and execution workflow for Claude Code
Autonomous Claude + Codex review loop. Plan a feature with adversarial pushback, or audit code, all in one window.
Interview command for fleshing out big feature plans and specifications
Independent plan/spec reviewer for AI coding agents. Verifies claims against the workspace and returns structured verdicts with findings.