By daymade
Run LLM evaluations with Promptfoo: configure prompt testing, write custom Python assertions, and use llm-rubric (LLM-as-judge) for model comparison and quality assurance.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub p/daymade-promptfoo-evaluation-promptfoo-evaluationCo-create a personal investment-research LLM Wiki (Andrej Karpathy's pattern) where the user's OWN analysis framework becomes a living CLAUDE.md — by interviewing them, NOT by handing them a template. Use whenever the user wants to build a compounding research knowledge base, 投研第二大脑, 投研知识库, or 个人投研 wiki; instantiate Karpathy's LLM Wiki gist for finance/investing; turn their stock-picking, analyst-tracking, or earnings-watching workflow into a structured markdown vault; or build a wiki tracking companies / industries / macro / analysts over time. Pure markdown + wikilinks, NO RAG / vector DB (Karpathy's core idea — do not over-engineer). Also triggers for ingesting research reports / earnings calls / expert notes into an existing wiki, and for post-earnings prediction→fulfillment reviews. Core value = extracting the user's personal investment preferences into THEIR OWN schema, never imposing a standard one.
Compare two videos and generate interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Use when analyzing compression results, evaluating codec performance, or assessing video quality differences
Generate format-controlled research reports with evidence tracking, source governance, and multi-pass synthesis. V6.1 adds: source accessibility (circular verification forbidden, exclusive advantage encouraged). Enterprise Research Mode: six-dimension data collection, SWOT/barrier/risk frameworks, and three-level quality control for company research
Scan and remove sensitive data (secrets, API keys, private domains/IPs, PII) from GitHub repository history. Use this skill whenever the user says scan sensitive data, clean git history, remove secrets from repo, sanitize GitHub history, 清理敏感数据, 历史重写, force push, 泄露, or needs to repair a public repo after accidental secret/private context leakage. Also use before any force push to a public repository to verify visibility, backup, and scan results.
Investigate and resolve Cloudflare configuration issues using API-driven evidence gathering. Use when troubleshooting ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS, SSL errors, DNS issues, or any Cloudflare-related problems
Teaches AI coding agents to create promptfoo eval suites with deterministic assertions, provider configs, and best practices
Benchmark, evaluate, and optimize skills to ensure reliable performance across all LLMs
Evaluate any LLM behind an OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoint across four dimensions — speed (TTFT + thinking-aware tokens/sec), concurrency/stability (success rate, p50/p90, breaking point), Anthropic protocol compliance (thinking-block trigger rate), and quality regression against your own accumulated use cases (blind-judge precision). Use to benchmark a model, verify a tokens-per-second claim, compare models head-to-head, or vet a newly released model before adopting it.
Agent and skill evaluation harness with MLflow integration
Skills for building LLM evaluations: pipeline audit, error analysis, synthetic data generation, LLM-as-Judge design, evaluator validation, RAG evaluation, and annotation interfaces.
Improve and test AI prompts for better Claude Code interactions