Help us improve
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Orchestrates a multi-agent academic research pipeline from literature review through peer review and revision, producing LaTeX/DOCX/PDF papers with citation verification, integrity checks, and bilingual abstracts.
npx claudepluginhub costrict-plugins-repo/imbad0202-academic-research-skills-academic-research-skills --plugin academic-research-skillsARS academic-paper `disclosure` mode — venue-specific AI-usage statement
ARS academic-paper `citation-check` mode — citation error report
ARS academic-paper `abstract-only` mode — bilingual abstract + keywords
ARS /ars-cache-invalidate — drop cached verification entries for a citation key
ARS academic-paper `format-convert` mode — convert to LaTeX / DOCX / PDF / Markdown
Transforms research findings into polished APA 7.0 academic reports; activated in Phase 4 and Phase 6
Designs the methodological blueprint; selects research paradigm, method, data strategy, and analytical framework
Integrates findings across sources, resolves evidence conflicts, and maps knowledge gaps
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
12-agent academic paper writing pipeline. 10 modes (full/plan/outline/revision/revision-coach/abstract/lit-review/format-convert/citation-check/disclosure). 6 paper types, 5 citation formats, bilingual abstracts, LaTeX/DOCX-via-Pandoc/PDF output. Style Calibration + Writing Quality Check + Anti-Patterns with IRON RULE markers. Triggers: write paper, academic paper, guide my paper, parse reviews, AI disclosure, 寫論文, 學術論文, 引導我寫論文, 審查意見.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.
Executes bash commands
Hook triggers when Bash tool is used
Modifies files
Hook triggers on file write and edit operations
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge.
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Production-grade academic research pipeline for Claude Code: research → write → review → revise → finalize. 4 skills, 35+ modes, 38-agent ensemble, v3.7.3 + v3.8 L3 claim-faithfulness gate, v3.9.0 cross-index triangulation, v3.10 triangulation policy layer, v3.11 deterministic citation verification gate (#182).
Multi-agent orchestrator for academic writing: 12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys.
Academic paper writing skills for ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AAAI)
Semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development, with skills for literature review, experiments, analysis, writing, and project knowledge management
Research integrity plugin for Claude Code — paper auditing, citation verification, experiment analysis, and methodology-first skills for academic workflows.
Manage your academic publication pipeline from Claude Code — list, search, create, move, analyse, export BibTeX, track reminders, and sync papers (GitHub + Overleaf) via the Kabbo MCP server.
753 cybersecurity skills covering web security, pentesting, DFIR, threat intelligence, cloud security, malware analysis, and more.
Create, customize, and manage plugins tailored to your organization's tools and workflows. Configure MCP servers, adjust plugin behavior, and adapt templates to match how your team works.
Zero-dependency HTML presentation generator with safe presets, bold template-library styles, PPT conversion, and anti-AI-slop design philosophy.
Core financial modeling and analysis tools: DCF, comps, LBO, 3-statement models, competitive analysis, and deck QC
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Share bugs, ideas, or general feedback.
A comprehensive suite of Claude Code skills for academic research, covering the full pipeline from research to publication.
Install in 30 seconds (Claude Code CLI / VS Code / JetBrains, v3.7.0+):
/plugin marketplace add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills
/plugin install academic-research-skills
Then try /ars-plan to walk through your paper structure via Socratic dialogue, or jump to Quick install for prerequisites and the traditional symlink flow.
AI is your copilot, not the pilot. This tool won't write your paper for you. It handles the grunt work — hunting down references, formatting citations, verifying data, checking logical consistency — so you can focus on the parts that actually require your brain: defining the question, choosing the method, interpreting what the data means, and writing the sentence after "I argue that."
Unlike a humanizer, this tool doesn't help you hide the fact that you used AI. It helps you write better. Style Calibration learns your voice from past work. Writing Quality Check catches the patterns that make prose feel machine-generated. The goal is quality, not cheating.
Lu et al. (2026, Nature 651:914-919) built The AI Scientist — the first fully autonomous AI research system to publish a paper through blind peer review at a top-tier ML venue (ICLR 2025 workshop, score 6.33/10 vs workshop average 4.87). Their Limitations section enumerates the failure modes that any fully-autonomous AI research pipeline inherits: implementation bugs, hallucinated results, shortcut reliance, bug-as-insight reframing, methodology fabrication, frame-lock, citation hallucinations.
ARS is built on the premise that a human researcher augmented by AI avoids these failure modes better than either alone. Stage 2.5 and Stage 4.5 integrity gates run a 7-mode blocking checklist (see academic-pipeline/references/ai_research_failure_modes.md); the reviewer offers an opt-in calibration mode that measures its own FNR/FPR against a user-supplied gold set.
Zhao et al. (2026-05) audited 111M references across 2.5M papers on arXiv, bioRxiv, SSRN, and PMC. Their conservative estimate is 146,932 hallucinated citations for 2025 alone, with an observed mid-2024 inflection; for the bioRxiv-to-PMC pairing they report 85.3% preprint-to-published persistence. The paper describes "real citations deployed to support claims the cited references do not actually make" as an open challenge. ARS v3.7.1 added trust-chain frontmatter for source provenance; v3.7.3 added locator infrastructure (three-layer citation anchors) for future claim-level audits and surfaces advisory risk signals at cite time (ARS labels the claim-faithfulness gap internally as "L3"; this is ARS terminology, not the paper's). v3.7.x is motivated by Zhao et al.'s corpus-scale findings; corpus-scale evaluation of ARS itself remains future work.
v3.8 closes the second half of the L3 gap. v3.7.3 made every citation carry a locator anchor; v3.8 adds an opt-in audit pass (ARS_CLAIM_AUDIT=1) that fetches the cited source against each anchor and judges whether the claim is actually supported. Five new HIGH-WARN classes (claim-not-supported, negative-constraint-violation, fabricated-reference, anchorless, constraint-violation-uncited) gate-refuse output through the formatter terminal hard gate. Calibration is shipped as a 20-tuple gold set with FNR<0.15 + FPR<0.10 acceptance thresholds; ramp-on plan is deferred to post-calibration evidence per v3.8 spec §5.
v3.3 was inspired by PaperOrchestra (Song, Song, Pfister & Yoon, 2026, Google): Semantic Scholar API verification, anti-leakage protocol, VLM figure verification, and score trajectory tracking.
👉 docs/ARCHITECTURE.md — the full pipeline view: flow diagram, stage-by-stage matrix, data-access flow, skill dependency graph, quality gates, and mode list.
The architecture doc supersedes the sprawling pipeline description that used to live here. Everything about what runs in which stage now lives in one place.
Prerequisites