By bostonaholic
Orchestrates specialist agents through an 8-phase pipeline (worktree, question, research, design, structure, plan, implement, PR) to autonomously implement entire features end-to-end, enforcing TDD, conventional commits, structured code reviews, and changelog updates with human gates at key decision points.
Use when an adversarial code review is needed after implementation. Reviews with fresh context and no shared conversation history to prevent self-evaluation bias. Produces a hard-gating verdict — REQUEST CHANGES blocks shipping. Example triggers — "review my changes", "code review the implementation", "check this PR for issues".
Use after research is complete to align with the user on the approach before any code is written. Drafts a ~200-line design document covering current state, desired end state, patterns to follow, decisions made, and explicit open questions for the user. MUST present the open questions interactively before producing the design — replaces the RPI "magic words" problem with structural interaction.
Use when you need to locate files in a codebase relevant to a specific area. Maps conceptual goals to actual file locations even when exact names are unknown. Operates from questions.md only, never the original task description.
Use when the implementation plan needs to be executed slice by slice. A seasoned coding expert that reads the approved plan, follows TDD discipline, executes one vertical slice at a time, and commits each slice atomically when its tests pass. Dispatched during the Implement phase.
Use after the structure is produced to create the tactical implementation plan. Translates each vertical slice in structure.md into precise file-level steps with acceptance test mappings. The plan is a tactical artifact for the implementer — neither the structure nor the plan is human-reviewed (design is the human gate).
Protocol a subagent uses to surface open questions to the user. Emit a fenced JSON envelope as the final assistant message and STOP; the orchestrator renders AskUserQuestion and resumes via SendMessage with the user's selections. Load this skill from any agent whose prompt has an interactive step.
Keep a Changelog methodology — loaded by the ship phase to update CHANGELOG.md with user-facing changes, filtering out internal-only commits
Generator-evaluator separation and review methodology — loaded by review agents to enforce fresh-context review discipline, Conventional Comments format, and gate verdicts
Architecture Decision Record creation and management — loaded by planner and orchestrator when significant technical decisions need to be recorded with context and consequences
Adversarially review a technical design document with fresh context before the human gate. Dispatches the built-in `general-purpose` subagent (clean context, no shared history with the design-author) against `docs/plans/<id>/design.md` and presents its verdict — APPROVE, REQUEST CHANGES, or COMMENT. Optional, not part of the QRSPI pipeline. Trigger on "review the design doc", "audit design.md", "is this design ready", or `/eng-design-doc-review`.
Executes bash commands
Hook triggers when Bash tool is used
Modifies files
Hook triggers on file write and edit operations
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Uses power tools
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
A Claude Code plugin that orchestrates specialized agents to autonomously implement entire features end-to-end, driven by the QRSPI workflow. The orchestrator is the main Claude Code session; it persists pipeline state as artifacts in docs/plans/ and tracks live progress with TodoWrite.
📖 Documentation: team.bostonaholic.dev
Each agent does work and returns an artifact. The orchestrator dispatches the next agent based on a phase table. Agents remain decoupled — they know nothing about each other.
WORKTREE → QUESTION → RESEARCH → DESIGN → STRUCTURE → PLAN → IMPLEMENT → PR
docs/plans/<id>/ inside it, keeping the home checkout's git status clean for the whole run.task.md) and neutral research questions (questions.md). The questioner is the only agent that ever sees the user's original description.questions.md. They never see the task. This structurally prevents opinion-bias in research findings./team Add rate limiting middleware to all API endpoints
For well-understood bugs, skip the QRSPI ceremony:
/team-fix Users see stale cache after profile update
Or run individual phases:
/team-worktree docs/plans/<id>/
/team-question Add rate limiting middleware to all API endpoints
/team-research docs/plans/<id>/
/team-design docs/plans/<id>/
/team-structure docs/plans/<id>/
/team-plan docs/plans/<id>/
/team-implement docs/plans/<id>/
/team-pr docs/plans/<id>/
In a full /team run the home worktree is created automatically at the
leading WORKTREE phase. Invoked standalone, /team-worktree consumes
plan.md (post-PLAN) — use it for manual recovery or multi-repo setup.
Each downstream command takes the artifact directory docs/plans/<id>/ as
its argument.
claude plugin add /path/to/team
See docs/architecture.md for the full architecture, the artifact frontmatter schema, and the phase-inference rules.
agents/ — decoupled workers that read predecessor artifacts from docs/plans/ and write their outputs thereskills/ — slash commands, the standalone /shipit land utility, and shared methodologieshooks/ — safety guards and docs/plans/-aware compaction resilienceskills/team/registry.json — phase-tagged inventory of the 13 agentsdocs/plans/<id>/*.md — <id> is <TICKET>-<topic> or <YYYY-MM-DD>-<topic>. Each artifact carries YAML frontmatter (topic, date, phase; gated artifacts also carry approved, approved_at, revision). Live in-session coordination uses TodoWrite.Skills for using the Reflect CLI
No description provided.
npx claudepluginhub bostonaholic/team --plugin teamUpstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.
Comprehensive startup business analysis with market sizing (TAM/SAM/SOM), financial modeling, team planning, and strategic research
v9.44.1 — Patch release for Gemini environment/version detection and qwen auth gating. Run /octo:setup.
Permanent coding companion for Claude Code — survives any update. MCP-based terminal pet with ASCII art, stats, reactions, and personality.
Complete creative writing suite with 10 specialized agents covering the full writing process: research gathering, character development, story architecture, world-building, dialogue coaching, editing/review, outlining, content strategy, believability auditing, and prose style/voice analysis. Includes genre-specific guides, templates, and quality checklists.
Comprehensive .NET development skills for modern C#, ASP.NET, MAUI, Blazor, Aspire, EF Core, Native AOT, testing, security, performance optimization, CI/CD, and cloud-native applications