Run multi-phase quality audits that catch intent violations — bugs that look right but aren't — by deriving behavioral requirements from codebases and documentation, then reviewing code against them
*Prompt template for the AI session driving an end-to-end QPB calibration cycle. The orchestrator AI executes Steps 1-12 from `ai_context/CALIBRATION_PROTOCOL.md`, spawns playbook subprocesses per benchmark, and writes the cycle audit + Lever Calibration Log entry. Designed for Claude Code sessions but will work in any tool with bash + file tools.*
AUTOMATION ONLY — DO NOT INVOKE FROM AN INTERACTIVE CODING SESSION. Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Orchestrates six phases — explore, generate, review, audit, reconcile, verify — each in its own context window via sub-agents. Then runs iteration strategies to find even more bugs. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
AUTOMATION ONLY — DO NOT INVOKE FROM AN INTERACTIVE CODING SESSION. Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Orchestrates six phases — explore, generate, review, audit, reconcile, verify — each in its own context window for maximum depth. Then runs iteration strategies to find even more bugs. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch.
Uses power tools
Uses Bash, Write, or Edit tools
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub andrewstellman/quality-playbook --plugin quality-playbookConfigurable code review with radical candor - choose between harsh direct feedback or constructive caring criticism. Features Technical.md for project standards, architectural context analysis, actionable fixes, decision register for tracking review decisions, seamless todo integration, and live browser QA via Chrome.
Audit codebase documentation for accuracy, completeness, and freshness against actual code. Auto-fixes small discrepancies, reports structural changes. Companion to agent-ready.
AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and six analysis modes (PR review, architecture audit, tech debt, test quality, health dashboard, full-sweep auto-fix)
Context-Driven Development: draft specs and plans before implementation. Structured workflows for features and fixes.
AWOS code quality audit framework
Upstash Context7 MCP server for up-to-date documentation lookup. Pull version-specific documentation and code examples directly from source repositories into your LLM context.