By adamjgmiller
Run a multi-lens code review pipeline: deep analysis, automated fix loops, manual promotion of findings, and injection of external issues, all synthesized into a single artifact for PR review.
Inject externally-sourced findings (cloud /ultrareview, manual finds, etc.) into the most recent /adamsreview:review artifact for this branch. Validates via Phase 4, re-renders, re-publishes.
Codex-driven deep code review producing the same artifact.json shape as :review (drop-in for /adamsreview:fix, :add, :walkthrough, :promote).
Apply auto-fixable code review findings. Dispatches fix-group agents, post-fix-reviews the working tree, commits survivors, reverts regressions, updates the artifact.
Promote a finding to auto-fixable via human override. Patches artifact, re-renders, re-publishes to PR.
Deep code review producing artifact.json, artifact.md, and (PR mode) a review comment on the PR.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Multi-stage code review for Claude Code — parallel sub-agent detection, validation passes, persistent JSON state, and an automated fix loop that re-reviews and reverts regressions before committing.
On my own PRs, it's been catching dramatically more real bugs than Claude Code's built-in /review, /ultrareview, CodeRabbit, Greptile, and Codex's built-in review — while producing fewer false positives. (Anecdotal, n=me.) Modeled after the built-in /review and extended into a six-command pipeline. Runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended) — unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.
/plugin marketplace add adamjgmiller/adamsreview
/plugin install adamsreview@adamsreview
The six commands:
/adamsreview:review — multi-lens code review of a branch or PR. Up to seven parallel sub-agent lenses (correctness, security, UX, etc.) feed a dedup pass, a cheap-then-deep validation gate, and (optionally) a holistic Opus cross-cutting pass. High-confidence auto-fix proposals are pre-computed so :fix and :walkthrough can batch-accept them in one confirm. --ensemble adds a Codex CLI pass and PR bot-comment scrape on top of the internal Claude lenses./adamsreview:codex-review — Codex CLI peer to :review. Same artifact shape, drop-in for everything downstream (:fix, :add, :walkthrough, :promote). Effort tunable via --effort low|medium|high|xhigh (default high)./adamsreview:add — inject externally-sourced findings (a Claude Code cloud /ultrareview paste, an Opus once-over, a teammate's note) into the most recent review's artifact. Deduped against what's already there, validated by the same gates, re-published to the existing PR comment./adamsreview:walkthrough — interactive driver for findings :fix would skip. Uses the harness's AskUserQuestion UI to walk through uncertain or human-judgment items one by one — promote what you want auto-fixed, skip the rest. Pre-computed auto-fix proposals are batch-accepted up front; the remainder get per-finding briefing + options + recommendation. Posts a decisions log to the PR./adamsreview:fix — automated fix loop. Dispatches per-fix-group sub-agents in parallel, then re-reviews the work with Opus, reverts any regressions, and commits the survivors (one combined commit by default; --granular-commits for one per group)./adamsreview:promote — human override that promotes a single finding to auto-fixable, bypassing the lane filter and score threshold.Command files live at bare-stem paths under commands/; shared phase fragments and prompt references live under fragments/; helper scripts and the artifact schema live under bin/. The plugin runtime auto-adds bin/ to $PATH on load — no symlinks, no install script.
On a non-trivial PR, the commands work best in this order:
/adamsreview:review — or /adamsreview:review --ensemble if you have the Codex CLI installed and want to pool a Codex pass plus a PR bot-comment scrape on top of the internal Claude lenses (higher token cost). Or /adamsreview:codex-review [--effort <level>] for a Codex-driven peer review (drop-in for everything downstream; effort tunable; no --ensemble)./adamsreview:add <paste...> — if you ran a parallel review (cloud /ultrareview, Opus once-over, manual scan, etc.) that surfaced bugs the original review missed, paste the result here. The findings are validated by Phase 4 and land in the same artifact, deduped against what's already there. Auto-eligible additions feed step 4; non-eligible ones surface in step 3./adamsreview:walkthrough [threshold] — step through findings the fix command would skip (deep-manual, deep-report, and the entire light lane including light confirmed_mechanical), restricted to those scoring at or above $threshold (default 60) so low-signal items don't pad the session. Step 4.5 batch-accepts all findings carrying a pre-computed auto-fix proposal in one confirm (the fast path); the rest get per-finding briefing + options + recommendation via the harness's AskUserQuestion UI. Promote the ones you want auto-fixed with tailored fix-hints, skip the rest. Posts a decisions log to the PR for audit. Pass a lower threshold (e.g. /adamsreview:walkthrough 30) and pick the Full tier at the preflight prompt to audit Phase-3-demoted below_gate findings too./adamsreview:fix — applies every auto-eligible finding (including whatever was added in step 2 and promoted in step 3). Phase 7.5 surfaces any remaining auto-fix proposals (light-lane / manual / report findings) for one-confirm batch-accept before Phase 8 dispatch. Default: one combined commit for all surviving fixes; pass --granular-commits for one commit per fix group. Per-group Phase-9 outcome lands in the commit message either way.npx claudepluginhub adamjgmiller/adamsreview --plugin adamsreviewMulti-agent code review for Claude Code — parallel review by Codex (GPT-5.5), Gemini 3.1 Pro, and five Claude specialist subagents (one run blind), then verified synthesis.
Review pull requests with structured analysis and approve with confidence
Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring
Symmetric two-AI peer review using OpenAI Codex CLI. Both AIs review independently in a blind pass, then debate per-issue with terminal states until convergence. Catches significantly more issues than single-pass validation.
Multi-model consensus engine integrating OpenAI Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and Claude CLI for collaborative code review and problem-solving.
Harness-native ECC plugin for engineering teams - 67 agents, 271 skills, 92 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, MCP conventions, and operator workflows for Claude Code plus adjacent agent harnesses