From aws-skills-for-claude-code
Reviews current code changes (unstaged/staged git diffs or specified files) with confidence-based scoring on criteria like shell POSIX compatibility and conventional commits, reporting only high-confidence issues with fixes.
npx claudepluginhub whchoi98/aws-skills-for-claude-code --plugin aws-skills-for-claude-code# Code Review Review the current code changes using confidence-based scoring. ## Step 1: Get Changes Determine the scope of review: - If $ARGUMENTS specifies files, review those files - Otherwise, review unstaged changes: `git diff` - If no unstaged changes, review staged changes: `git diff --cached` ## Step 2: Review For each changed file, apply the code-review skill criteria: - SKILL.md YAML frontmatter format (description field required) - Shell script POSIX compatibility (macOS/Linux) - Bilingual documentation consistency (EN/KR) - Conventional Commits format ## Step 3: Score and...
/reviewInvokes external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen, Cursor) to peer review specified phase plans, producing structured REVIEWS.md with feedback.
/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.
/reviewRuns Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.
/reviewOrchestrates multi-LLM code review across Codex, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and others; checks provider availability and posts inline PR comments.
/reviewReviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.
/reviewReviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.
Review the current code changes using confidence-based scoring.
Determine the scope of review:
git diffgit diff --cachedFor each changed file, apply the code-review skill criteria:
Rate each issue 0-100. Only report issues with confidence >= 75.
Present findings in structured format with file paths, line numbers, and fix suggestions. If no high-confidence issues, confirm code meets standards.