Flip the problem - instead of how to succeed, figure out how to fail, then avoid that
Applies inversion thinking to identify failure modes and convert them into success requirements.
/plugin marketplace add sponticelli/gamedev-claude-plugins/plugin install thinking@gamedev-claude-pluginsInstead of asking "How do I achieve X?", ask "What would guarantee I fail at X?" Then systematically avoid those things.
## Inversion: [Goal]
### The Goal
[What success looks like]
### Inverted Question
"What would guarantee we FAIL at [goal]?"
### The Failure Recipe
To absolutely, certainly fail, we would:
1. **[Failure mode 1]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
2. **[Failure mode 2]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
3. **[Failure mode 3]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
4. **[Failure mode 4]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
5. **[Failure mode 5]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
6. **[Failure mode 6]**
- How it causes failure: [Explanation]
### Inverting Back: The Success Requirements
| To Fail | To Succeed |
|---------|------------|
| [Failure 1] | [Avoid/opposite of 1] |
| [Failure 2] | [Avoid/opposite of 2] |
| [Failure 3] | [Avoid/opposite of 3] |
| [Failure 4] | [Avoid/opposite of 4] |
| [Failure 5] | [Avoid/opposite of 5] |
| [Failure 6] | [Avoid/opposite of 6] |
### The Non-Negotiables
Based on inversion, we MUST:
- [ ] [Critical requirement 1]
- [ ] [Critical requirement 2]
- [ ] [Critical requirement 3]
### Warning Signs
If we see these, we're heading toward failure:
- [Warning sign 1]
- [Warning sign 2]
- [Warning sign 3]
### The Insight
[What inversion revealed that forward-thinking missed]
Goal: Happy marriage
Goal: Successful career
Goal: Healthy life
Apply to user's goal immediately.