/think

Activate deep analysis mode to reason through complex problems with extended multi-step thinking. ## Steps 1. Read the user's problem statement carefully. Identify the core question and any constraints. 2. Break the problem into sub-problems: 3. For each sub-problem, reason through possible approaches: 4. Evaluate trade-offs between approaches using criteria: 5. Synthesize findings into a coherent solution with clear reasoning chain. 6. Validate the solution by checking it against the original constraints. 7. Present the analysis with confidence level (high/medium/low). ## Format #...

Activate deep analysis mode to reason through complex problems with extended multi-step thinking.

Steps

Read the user's problem statement carefully. Identify the core question and any constraints.
Break the problem into sub-problems:
For each sub-problem, reason through possible approaches:
Evaluate trade-offs between approaches using criteria:
Synthesize findings into a coherent solution with clear reasoning chain.
Validate the solution by checking it against the original constraints.
Present the analysis with confidence level (high/medium/low).

Format

Problem: <restated problem>
Sub-problems: <numbered list>
Analysis: <reasoning for each sub-problem>
Solution: <recommended approach>

Rules

Spend at least 60% of effort on understanding the problem before solving it.
Never jump to the first solution that comes to mind.
Always consider what could go wrong with the chosen approach.

Activate deep analysis mode to reason through complex problems with extended multi-step thinking.

Steps

Read the user's problem statement carefully. Identify the core question and any constraints.
Break the problem into sub-problems:
For each sub-problem, reason through possible approaches:
Evaluate trade-offs between approaches using criteria:
Synthesize findings into a coherent solution with clear reasoning chain.
Validate the solution by checking it against the original constraints.
Present the analysis with confidence level (high/medium/low).

Format

Problem: <restated problem>
Sub-problems: <numbered list>
Analysis: <reasoning for each sub-problem>
Solution: <recommended approach>

Rules

Spend at least 60% of effort on understanding the problem before solving it.
Never jump to the first solution that comes to mind.
Always consider what could go wrong with the chosen approach.

Invocation

Context Preview

Command Content

/think

Invocation

Context Preview

Command Content

Steps

Format

Rules

Reused across plugins

Other plugins with /think

Steps

Format

Rules

Reused across plugins

Other plugins with /think