Slash Command

/review

Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings

Install

npx claudepluginhub rbergman/dark-matter-marketplace --plugin dm-team

Details

Argument--pr <number>, --commits <range>, --only <acs>, --min-severity <level>, --skip-beads

Prompt Preview

# /review

Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

## Command behavior

1. **Scope detection**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits).

2. **Scout**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization.

3. **Create review team**: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts:
   - Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain)
   - Scout findings (project type, pat...

Command Content

Other plugins with /review

/review

commands/

Reviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.

agent-skills

19.5k

/review

Runs Codex code review on local git state (working tree or vs base branch). Supports --wait/--background, --base <ref>, --scope auto|working-tree|branch.

ReadGlobGrep+3

codex

11.4k

/review

commands/

Orchestrates multi-LLM code review across Codex, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and others; checks provider availability and posts inline PR comments.

octo

2.8k

/review

Reviews HTML file for design anti-patterns, principles violations, and accessibility issues. Generates markdown report with status tables and recommendations.

ReadGlobGrep+2

frontend-design-pro

2.7k

/review

Reviews specified code scope via four specialists (quality, security, performance, architecture), producing summary, detailed findings, refactoring suggestions, prioritized action plan.

essentials

2.4k

/review

Dispatches the reviewer agent to review current branch code changes against code quality principles.

frontend-fundamentals

1.9k

Stats

Parent Repo Stars2

Parent Repo Forks2

Last CommitFeb 6, 2026

Actions

View Source View Plugin View on GitHub View README

# /review Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings. Arguments: $ARGUMENTS ## Command behavior 1. **Scope detection**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits). 2. **Scout**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization. 3. **Create review team**: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts: - Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain) - Scout findings (project type, pat...

/review

Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Command behavior

Scope detection: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits).

Scout: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization.

Create review team: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts:

Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain)
Scout findings (project type, patterns, hotspots)
Their review checklist (same checklists as dm-work:review)
Domain-specific skills to activate
Instruction: "After initial review, share findings with teammates and discuss"

Monitor debate: Lead watches for:

Reviewers sharing findings (good)
Cross-examination happening (good)
Convergence (time to synthesize)
Stalemate (intervene to resolve)

Synthesize: Merge findings, resolve conflicts, produce unified assessment.

Output: Same as dm-work:review Phase 5 (local mode with beads, or PR mode with GitHub comments), plus Review Discussion Notes section.

Tag checkpoint: Move review tag to HEAD (same as dm-work:review).

Cleanup team.

/review

Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Command behavior

Scope detection: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits).
Scout: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization.
Create review team: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts:
- Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain)
- Scout findings (project type, patterns, hotspots)
- Their review checklist (same checklists as dm-work:review)
- Domain-specific skills to activate
- Instruction: "After initial review, share findings with teammates and discuss"
Monitor debate: Lead watches for:
- Reviewers sharing findings (good)
- Cross-examination happening (good)
- Convergence (time to synthesize)
- Stalemate (intervene to resolve)
Synthesize: Merge findings, resolve conflicts, produce unified assessment.
Output: Same as dm-work:review Phase 5 (local mode with beads, or PR mode with GitHub comments), plus Review Discussion Notes section.
Tag checkpoint: Move review tag to HEAD (same as dm-work:review).
Cleanup team.