/review

Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings.

Arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Command behavior

1. Scope detection: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits).

2. Scout: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization.

3. Create review team: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts:

   • Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain)
   • Scout findings (project type, patterns, hotspots)
   • Their review checklist (same checklists as dm-work:review)
   • Domain-specific skills to activate
   • Instruction: "After initial review, share findings with teammates and discuss"

4. Monitor debate: Lead watches for:

   • Reviewers sharing findings (good)
   • Cross-examination happening (good)
   • Convergence (time to synthesize)
   • Stalemate (intervene to resolve)

5. Synthesize: Merge findings, resolve conflicts, produce unified assessment.

6. Output: Same as dm-work:review Phase 5 (local mode with beads, or PR mode with GitHub comments), plus Review Discussion Notes section.

7. Tag checkpoint: Move review tag to HEAD (same as dm-work:review).

8. Cleanup team.