Stats
Actions
Tags
'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.16'%2F%3E%3Cstop%20offset%3D'1'%20stop-color%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20stop-opacity%3D'0.03'%2F%3E%3C%2FlinearGradient%3E%3C%2Fdefs%3E%3Crect%20width%3D'320'%20height%3D'200'%20fill%3D'url(%23g)'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'250'%20cy%3D'56'%20r%3D'92'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.06'%2F%3E%3Ccircle%20cx%3D'64'%20cy%3D'172'%20r%3D'58'%20fill%3D'rgb(200%2C90%2C60)'%20fill-opacity%3D'0.05'%2F%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E)
From rlm-claude-code
Reviews current changes using a structured checklist covering correctness, type safety, testing, performance, security, and style, producing actionable feedback with file:line references.
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/rlm-claude-code:code-reviewThe summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
Review the current changes following docs/process/code-review.md. ## Review Checklist ### Correctness - Does the implementation match the spec section? (cite §X.Y) - Are edge cases handled (empty context, max depth, timeout)? - Do error states produce meaningful messages? ### Type Safety - All public functions have return type annotations? - No `# type: ignore` without justification? ### Testing - Unit tests for new functions? - Property tests for data transformations? - Security tests for REPL operations? ### Performance - Complexity classifier <50ms? - REPL execution <100ms? - No O(...
Review the current changes following docs/process/code-review.md.
uv run ty check src/
# type: ignore without justification?uv run ruff check src/
uv run ruff format src/ --check
Provide specific, actionable feedback with file:line references.
Blocking issues: Must fix before commit Non-blocking: File as issues for later
npx claudepluginhub rand/rlm-claude-code --plugin rlm-claude-code/python-reviewReviews Python code for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security vulnerabilities, and Pythonic idioms. Runs static analysis and generates a severity-categorized report.
/code-reviewPerforms comprehensive code review across quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Provides actionable feedback categorized by severity. Also supports reviewing specific files, directories, or pull requests.
/reviewReviews code quality of optional file or recent changes, providing assessment, issues found, recommendations, and best practices.
/python-reviewReviews Python code for PEP 8 compliance, type hints, security vulnerabilities, and Pythonic idioms. Runs static analysis and produces a categorized severity report.
/reviewInitiates a code review via the @code-reviewer agent for a specified file path or recent changes. Evaluates quality, security, performance, best practices, and bugs with actionable feedback.
/reviewPerforms a structured code review with severity categorization (Critical/High/Medium/Low) on a file or recent changes. Produces a markdown table of issues and a verdict.